Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

KoKo

(84,711 posts)
Sat Jun 13, 2015, 10:36 AM Jun 2015

How Pelosi broke with Obama--Behind the Scenes of the TAA/TPA

by Jake Sherman, John Bresnahan and Lauren French--Politico-6/12/15

Her final-hour move against the president’s trade agenda marks a low point in a relationship that produced his biggest achievements.

It had come to this: Nancy Pelosi needed John Boehner to help save her party and her president from an ugly public meltdown.

By Friday morning, it was clear that a crucial piece of Barack Obama’s trade initiative was barreling toward defeat. Democrats were disjointed, dispirited, even angry in some cases. At the same time, they knew that they – not Republicans – would shoulder much of the blame for killing the president’s top legislative priority and for the ensuing spectacle of a party at war.

So just before noon, with debate already underway on the House floor, Pelosi picked up the phone and called Boehner to inform him that a must-pass component of the White House trade package was going to fail. It was the second such warning from Pelosi to Boehner in two days.

“Are you still going ahead?” Pelosi asked him, according to sources familiar with the call. “Are you going to pull the bill?”

No, he wasn’t, Boehner replied. This was his best chance to push fast-track trade authority across his unpredictable House floor, he told Pelosi.

Hours later, the House resoundingly defeated Trade Adjustment Assistance, a federal aid program to help workers who lose their jobs to free trade. The vote effectively scuttled Obama’s bid for fast-track trade authority – though Republicans may try to revive it in the coming days or weeks – because it was conditioned on approval of the jobs bill.

Pelosi was a minor player for much of Obama’s push to secure authority to clinch the Trans-Pacific Partnership, a 12-nation pact that would be the largest free-trade deal in history. But as the vote neared, and major Democratic opposition bubbled to the surface, she was in a wrenching position: naturally inclined to deliver for a president she’s worked hand-in-glove with for years, but all-too-aware of the strong progressive winds within her caucus against a deal Democrats believe would jilt American workers.

Up until moments before Friday’s vote, Pelosi hadn’t told a soul how she was going to vote on TAA or Trade Promotion Authority, the fast-track trade law Obama was seeking.

No one could get a good read on her: Some Democrats thought Pelosi was wary of the trade package, others believed she’d ultimately back Obama. Still others figured she’d split the difference, backing TAA, but bucking Obama’s request for fast-track authority.

More....interesting read at:

http://www.politico.com/story/2015/06/how-pelosi-broke-with-obama-118961.html?ml=tl_10_b

14 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

yallerdawg

(16,104 posts)
2. There are two possible outcomes for Nancy Pelosi on her choice here.
Sat Jun 13, 2015, 11:02 AM
Jun 2015

She could go down in history as one of the greatest political forces ever! If she can steer this Republican Congress to unimagined progressive legislation - to get a deal - and get everything she wants, and saves TAA, the program she had just modified, she will be acknowledged as "The Master Politician!"

If she continues to oppose funding for displaced workers, TAA, something associated with the most progressive trade promotion policies ever proposed, by a Republican Congress, this will go down in history as one of the greatest political betrayals ever!

Her legacy will be tarnished forever as she virtually ends the effectiveness of the Democratic President Obama's agenda, assuring his lame duck status after 6 years of unrelenting Republican intransigence, now ending mirrored by our own party!

I hope Madame Speaker gets the job done - and we can remember her as one of the greatest Democrats of all time!

bahrbearian

(13,466 posts)
3. I agree if Obama continues to push the TAA he will betray the American Worker
Sat Jun 13, 2015, 11:16 AM
Jun 2015

The funding for the TAA will be 700 million from Medicare, They know there will be jobs lost. thats why they have to fund TAA

yallerdawg

(16,104 posts)
4. Wrong.
Sat Jun 13, 2015, 11:24 AM
Jun 2015

"The Africa Trade Bill and Repeal of Medicare Offset" negotiated by Nancy Pelosi was passed Thursday, the day before the TAA vote.

This line is disingenuous at best.

yallerdawg

(16,104 posts)
9. The thing is...
Sat Jun 13, 2015, 01:23 PM
Jun 2015

even though American jobs will be lost tomorrow due to corporate capitalism, globalization, automation, robotics, technology, computerization and Republican cuts to government employment, "Don't blame me. I voted no on Obama trade!" is about the easiest choice a Democrat ever makes. It's protectionism and isolationism.

We have to praise the weakest effort they could ever make?

yallerdawg

(16,104 posts)
11. The Republicans attached a Medicare offset to fund TAA.
Sun Jun 14, 2015, 11:23 AM
Jun 2015

Republicans believe unemployment insurance is enough for displaced workers, so if Democrats want additional coverage, it has to be a painful choice.

Nancy Pelosi negotiated Tuesday night with Boehner and the offset for TAA was changed to a pay-for from fees for false tax reporting and completely disassociated from Medicare funding.

Victory! This bill, H.R. 1295, passed the House 397-32, only 3 Democrats not voting for the bill.

This language was not included in the H.R. 1314 TAA/TPA bill as an amendment, because that would have to go back to the Senate for another agonizing revote on the entire package. A virtual start over! Nobody wanted to start all over!

So, while the issue for House Democrats was resolved in their favor, we still hear the same false refrain - TAA will cost Medicare funding in the future -- even though it won't, and the House Democrats had just voted overwhelmingly for the fix!

What the House Democrats did Friday was vote against their own proposal! I wonder who they learned that from? And what purpose it will serve?

KoKo

(84,711 posts)
13. Latest I read was that they swapped out Medicare being used to pay for Worker Assistance...
Sun Jun 14, 2015, 05:39 PM
Jun 2015

and tied it to some kind of Tax Reform to pay for it. Nancy and Dem Progressives felt the proposal was weak and didn't offer enough funding so that's why they voted against it in the end. Even the new proposal didn't go well.

Either they manage to redo that in a conference and put more money in for Worker Compensation and add Public Workers or it will be voted down again. And, then isn't there the Senate Redo...since the language would have to be changed in the bill they voted for with the Medicare language in there?

The whole thing is a maneuver that is hard for us, out here, to understand and keep up with. Even reporters have a hard time with it because everything switches in the back rooms with trading votes and parliamentary procedure and the rest.

Either they fix the language and the Workers Assistance brings in enough votes on the Dem Side to pass it this week and send it back to Senate for reconciliation...or they hold firm and vote it down. I've read Republicans don't want to add additional funding from using tax incentives so while the Dems might get more votes with change of funding the Repubs won't go for it.

Obama was supposed to be Lobbying over the Weekend to get more votes according to Politico on Friday.

 

truebluegreen

(9,033 posts)
6. I'd have to say that whether Nancy Pelosi is remembered
Sat Jun 13, 2015, 11:40 AM
Jun 2015

as one of the greatest Democrats of all time! will depend on the definition of Democrat! I guess all the Democrats who voted against TAA aren't really Democrats! while the Republicans who voted for it ARE Democrats! Or something!

Ridiculous...as is calling TPP the most progressive trade promotion policy ever proposed! "Progressive"??!!!1!!?

KoKo

(84,711 posts)
14. I know... I'll believe it when I see it after it goes back to Senate..
Sun Jun 14, 2015, 05:54 PM
Jun 2015

Then we can celebrate. I'm haunted by what went on in the Senate with their first vote and then the betrayal. And, Obama was lobbying over the weekend and who knows what else was being traded to get a win for those who want it so badly. I hope that Nancy doesn't want this to be her legacy, if it passes. But, then...she could say it was a good thing (that all workers protections were put in there) and move on.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»How Pelosi broke with Oba...