WSJ: Surprise Bills for Many Under Health Law
Out-of-network charges often arent flagged before treatment, consumers say; states tightening laws
http://www.wsj.com/articles/surprise-bills-for-many-under-health-law-1434042543
The laws limits dont apply to charges from out-of-network providers, and many insurance plans sold on ACA exchanges have limited networksamplifying the risk of surprise bills.
Health plans offered by employers also have been slimming down the number of doctors and hospitals in their networks. But what have come to be known as narrow networks are more prevalent in plans offered on the health laws exchanges, one tactic insurers are using to curtail costs because they cant exclude consumers with existing medical conditions.
still_one
(92,409 posts)clearly stated in the respective policies between In Network verses out of Network.
antigop
(12,778 posts)"The laws limits dont apply to charges from out-of-network providers..."
still_one
(92,409 posts)PPO premiums cost more.
The purpose of the ACA wasn't to address this problem, it was mostly insurance reform, and to insure the uninsured.
In addition, the issue you mentioned would NOT be corrected by socialized medicine or Medicare for all, which incidentally I am all for, but doubt it will happen.
Not everyone accepts Medicare or those covered under the ACA. Texas is notorious for physicians who do not accept Medicare for example. In addition, unless you have an advantage plan, you need some kind of supplemental plan under Medicare or you could incur some major costs.
antigop
(12,778 posts)Human101948
(3,457 posts)Republicans keep framing every problem in healthcare as being the fault of Obamacare when 95% of the time it's the fault of the insurance companies.
antigop
(12,778 posts)The ACA didn't fix the problem, so, yeah, the ACA is part of the problem.
still_one
(92,409 posts)same would apply to a socialized medical system, not everyone facility would be compelled to accept it, and I do not see anywhere that the law can or will be changed to make it so. Canada and Great Britain have private facilities for those who do not want to go through the system.
Doctor_J
(36,392 posts)the ACA. So yeah, the law shares a lot of the fault