Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

unhappycamper

(60,364 posts)
Tue Feb 7, 2012, 11:15 AM Feb 2012

Wall Street Consultants Complain: STOCK Act Transparency Proposal Will “Hurt Middle Class Americans”

http://www.republicreport.org/2012/wall-street-disclosure-whine/

Wall Street Consultants Complain: STOCK Act Transparency Proposal Will “Hurt Middle Class Americans”
Lee Fang 2.7.2012 at 9:19 AM

In the Senate debate last week to amend the STOCK Act, a measure to prevent insider trading by lawmakers and some federal officials, Sen. Charles Grassley (R-Iowa) successfully attached a smart proposal to the bill to require “political intelligence” firms to face disclosure requirements just as other lobbying firms are forced to disclose their clients.

The secretive world of political intelligence firms is only known outside of the financial industry and the Beltway by way of several investigative pieces by the Wall Street Journal. In essence, these firms do not qualify as traditional lobbyists because they exist to provide Wall Street speculators with advanced knowledge of impending legislative actions. An exposé published in 2006 revealed that major hedge funds, including Elliott & Associates, D.E. Shaw & Co., and Angelo Gordon & Co., worked with political intelligence companies to make investment decisions.

Grassley’s amendment to the STOCK Act is being met with vitriol by political intelligence professionals. CNBC spoke to several firms involved in this industry, and predictably, they claim that simple disclosure will result in disaster. The hyperbolic consultants, including Charles Gabriel, a congressional staffer turned political intelligence operative for Wall Street, laughably told CNBC that the Grassley measure will “hurt … middle class Americans”:

~snip~

“Members can perhaps be forgiven for rushing to judgment with an election-year fix for inadequacies perceived in the application of insider trading statutes to Congress, punctuated, as they have been, by embarrassing revelations re key members’ opportunistic investing,” said Gabriel. “But most worrisomely of all, the STOCK Act’s prescriptions would arguably hurt the exact middle class Americans whom it is designed to protect.”
1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Wall Street Consultants Complain: STOCK Act Transparency Proposal Will “Hurt Middle Class Americans” (Original Post) unhappycamper Feb 2012 OP
It certainly will! MADem Feb 2012 #1

MADem

(135,425 posts)
1. It certainly will!
Tue Feb 7, 2012, 11:19 AM
Feb 2012

It will hurt the feelings of all Americans, not just middle class ones, when they realize how badly our legislators have been FUCKING us over in pursuit of their own greedy profits all these years!

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»Wall Street Consultants C...