Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

kaitcat

(193 posts)
Tue Feb 7, 2012, 01:16 PM Feb 2012

RW-nut take on Komen -- Big Abortion puts breast cancer charity in its place.

The, uh, "liberal media" is to blame for what happened, not Komen's politicization of its own cause. Oh, that the left was that powerful, or that the media was liberal.

http://fullcomment.nationalpost.com/2012/02/07/big-abortion-puts-breast-cancer-charity-in-its-place/

Score one for Big Media and the Liberal Elites.

If Newt Gingrich needed a handy example to back up his contention that a pack of comfortable leftwingers who dominate the mainstream U.S. media habitually filter news coverage through the prism of their one agenda, the furor over the Susan G. Komen Foundation may have just provided it.

The Foundation is the biggest U.S. breast cancer charity, which has spent almost $2 billion since 1982 paying for mammograms and financing research into breast cancer. It suddenly found itself under fierce attack, however, when it announced it would cut off $680,000 in funding for Planned Parenthood, which is disliked by U.S. conservative groups because it helps people get abortions. The Foundation said an internal policy bars it from funding organizations that are under investigation by Congress. Handily enough, a Congressional subcommittee headed by a Florida Republican is looking into whether Planned Parenthood uses federal funds to pay for abortions.

Komen’s decision was treated as a thinly-veiled attack on the forces of Choice and sparked an immediate reaction. Celebrities, pro-Choice groups, social media, well-financed activists and armies of commentators weighed in, overwhelmingly condemning the decision. The charity’s bosses, apparently caught by surprise, were crushed under the onslaught. They tried changing their story, but when that failed, quickly cut their losses, issued a blanket apology and reversed the decision. Planned Parenthood can now use its money for anything it feels like, as far as the Komen folks are concerned.

So everything’s fine now. Except, in the aftermath, there are questions being asked about coverage of the affair, and whether the media inadvertently displayed its overwhelming bias in favour of the Choice people.

...more at link.

1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RW-nut take on Komen -- Big Abortion puts breast cancer charity in its place. (Original Post) kaitcat Feb 2012 OP
Wrong, but very well written propaganda. DCKit Feb 2012 #1
 

DCKit

(18,541 posts)
1. Wrong, but very well written propaganda.
Tue Feb 7, 2012, 03:06 PM
Feb 2012

The author does an excellent job of coming off as the voice of reason.

If Komen was so concerned about their funds being used only for screening, testing and treatment of breast cancer, why didn't they just say that?

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»RW-nut take on Komen -- B...