What Would It Take to Trust Komen Again? (Clara Jeffrey, Mother Jones)
http://motherjones.com/politics/2012/02/komen-board-bias-planned-parenthood. . .
But all attention that's been paid to the Handel/Fleischer deus ex machina, however, misses the greater culprit: a sucky board.
What do I mean?
The board of directors (not to be confused with Komen's multitudinous advisory boards) currently has nine members. There's Nancy Brinker, who founded Susan G. Komen in the name of her sister, who died of breast cancer. Brinker is a major mover and shaker in Dallas GOP circles, and a former major bundler, a.k.a. "Pioneer," for George W. Bush. Also on the board is Brinker's son Eric. Then there's Dallas socialite/philanthropist/GOP donor/oil baroness/Junior Leaguer Linda Custard, who chairs the board of the elite Hockaday prep school (once attended by G.W. Bush's daughters), and serves as a trustee for Southern Methodist University (eventual home to the G.W. Bush Library). Connie O'Neill has a similar portfolio; she notably serves on the school district finance committee of the uber tony Highland Park (the most enthusiastically conservative zip code in the country), as well as the Crystal Charity ball, which is ne plus ultra in the world of rich Texas Republicans (and where O'Neill was coincidentally named one of Dallas' ten best dressed women). Also in the rich Republicans camp is corporate real estate law firm founder (and Silicon Valley VC) Linda Law, who's a Republican National Committee Regent, meaning a $250,000+ donor.
But wait, there are a few Democrats, including former Nine West executive Brenda Lauderback, who made some modest donations to Obama but is also notable for the number of boards she serves on (Bloomberg Businessweek links her to 51 board members in five different organizations across six different industries). Fellow Obama donor, oncologist Dr. LaSalle D. Leffall Jr., is co-chair of the board, and the only medical professional on it. A bigger Dem donor is lobbyist John D. Raffaelli, whose firm Capital Counsel LLC helps both GOP and Dem causes; he was also the counsel for tax and international trade to former Sen. Lloyd Bentsen (D-Tex.). Finally there's the only board member without any track record of political donation: breast cancer survivor, longtime Komen foot soldier, and VP at a hospital consulting service, Elyse Gellerman, whose job is to represent the Komen affiliates.
But my point isn't about who's a Republican and who's a Democrat. The point is that Komen is a giant grant-making operation (nearly $2 billion since 1982) that purports to represent all of womanhood and it's being run as if it were still a small family foundation. Brinker and son, Custard, and O'Neill all run in the same circles, sit on the same boards, send their kids to the same elite schools. Komen's board makes a nod to race (both Lauderback and Leffal are African-American), a nod to medicine, and a nod to someone with pull in DNC circles, but the core is a group of rich, Texan, conservative friends.
. . .
Warren Stupidity
(48,181 posts)they are bullshit for a lot of reasons.
niyad
(113,325 posts)saras
(6,670 posts)And since they were never really deserving of that trust - they've ALWAYS kept too much money for themselves for a respectable charity, and they've ALWAYS taken the corporate line on pollution and cancer - I'd say that what it takes is an entire alternative universe, where they've behaved differently from the get-go.
Pab Sungenis
(9,612 posts)(1) Drop the Komen name. Susan Komen had nothing to do with activism other than dying of breast cancer. Her sister, Nancy Brinker, named it after her realizing that people would be less likely to donate to a "women's" charity if they knew it was being run by a Republican politician. This way people would think that a woman named "Susan G. Komen" had started it.
(2) Fire the entire board of directors, from Brinker on down.
(3) Brinker returns every penny she collected from the "charity."
(4) The "fundraising" budget needs to be slashed by 2/3. The name itself should have been enough to raise funds and the "fundraising" money was just used for pinkwashing.
(5) Cut the "promotional" budget by 2/3. See above.
(6) All remaining funds should be divided among the two least-funded areas of the foundation: TREATMENT (should get 75% of the reallocated funds) and RESEARCH (should get another 25%). As it is, less than 27 cents of every dollar raised goes to these two areas; it should be the other way around with them getting 73 cents.