Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

EEO

(1,620 posts)
Thu Jul 9, 2015, 09:38 PM Jul 2015

Texas Textbook Analyzes Robert E. Lee's Presidency, South's Freeing of Slaves

The reason why Texas and its choice of school textbooks is important has to do with the size of the state and the laziness of publishers. As one of the biggest states in terms of population, publishers will keep their textbooks in line with what Texas (and California) want, and those textbooks will then be sold nationally - after Texas approves it for use. Satire warning.

Again, Texas has been in the news recently because a new school social studies textbook is full of truthiness. It ranks slavery as the third cause of the Civil War and keeps some small stuff out like Jim Crow and segregation.


Texas Textbook Analyzes Robert E. Lee's Presidency, South's Freeing of Slaves

AUSTIN, TEXAS (The Nil Admirari): A new Texas school textbook titled "Remembering the Great Confederacy" analyzes Robert E. Lee's presidency and the South's freeing of the slaves following the Civil War. The Texas Board of Education has announced the book will be used in every district in the state beginning this coming school year.

And...

"Remembering the Great Confederacy" does not mention the African American struggle for civil rights after the end of slavery, but Bahorich defended the textbook by stating, "There's no reason to upset people."


TNA
8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Texas Textbook Analyzes Robert E. Lee's Presidency, South's Freeing of Slaves (Original Post) EEO Jul 2015 OP
Pathetic, AuntPatsy Jul 2015 #1
Robt E Lee wasn't President, he was General of the Confederate Army. HooptieWagon Jul 2015 #2
did you miss this? (not to mention the satire warning???) niyad Jul 2015 #3
Didn't see any satire warning... HooptieWagon Jul 2015 #5
satire warning at end of first linked paragraph. niyad Jul 2015 #6
Sounds like an alternate history like exboyfil Jul 2015 #4
Every post I have ever seen by EEO is "satire". Thor_MN Jul 2015 #7
Figured It Was Satire erpowers Jul 2015 #8
 

HooptieWagon

(17,064 posts)
2. Robt E Lee wasn't President, he was General of the Confederate Army.
Thu Jul 9, 2015, 09:46 PM
Jul 2015

Jefferson Davis was President of the CSA. If the book gets such a simple fact so wrong, I can only imagine what a botchup the remainder is.

 

HooptieWagon

(17,064 posts)
5. Didn't see any satire warning...
Thu Jul 9, 2015, 10:02 PM
Jul 2015

And I didn't click the link as it sounded like more RW nuttiness and revisionist history. Tnx for the heads up.

niyad

(113,323 posts)
6. satire warning at end of first linked paragraph.
Thu Jul 9, 2015, 10:04 PM
Jul 2015

sadly, the texas textbook committees have gone so far beyond insanity that satire is almost not possible (and I thought they were crazy back in the 70's!!)

exboyfil

(17,863 posts)
4. Sounds like an alternate history like
Thu Jul 9, 2015, 09:59 PM
Jul 2015

Harry Turtledove's Timeline-191 (where Lee's orders before Antietam were not found by Union troops)

 

Thor_MN

(11,843 posts)
7. Every post I have ever seen by EEO is "satire".
Fri Jul 10, 2015, 10:26 AM
Jul 2015

Or at least what is considered satire by someone. Most follow the formula of:

1. Pick any random headline.
2. Stretch it in some ridiculous direction.
3. Post it as satire.
4. Lather, Rinse, Repeat (very frequently)

Unfortunately, fully blocking EEO does not prevent the posts from appearing on the Home page. They used to show up in Politics, but now have moved to good reads. My opinion is that they are not humorous, but should be in Humor.

erpowers

(9,350 posts)
8. Figured It Was Satire
Fri Jul 10, 2015, 04:35 PM
Jul 2015

The title is not what let me know this post was satire. I did not read the top of the post first. Instead I read the highlighted sections first. After reading those section I was set to post a reply asking someone to tell me the original post was satire. I knew some of the information was wrong. However, I thought someone it Texas might be trying to pass that misinformation off as fact. I realized the original post was satire when I went back to read the beginning of the post and saw the satire warning.

I am very happy the original post is satire. The sad part is that with the way things are going anyone could have believed it was true. I guess someone could say it is shocking that the South has not tried something like that already.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»Texas Textbook Analyzes R...