Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

IDemo

(16,926 posts)
Fri Aug 21, 2015, 10:02 AM Aug 2015

Sorry Jeb, 'anchor babies' is a slur

Open mouth, insert foot. On Thursday, Jeb Bush stepped into controversy when he used the loaded term "anchor babies" to refer to the U.S.-born children of undocumented immigrants. In a testy exchange with reporters in New Hampshire, Bush said that he doesn't believe the expression is offensive and blamed Democrats for perpetuating the notion that it is an insult. "Do you have a better term?" he asked one reporter. "You give me a better term and I'll use it."

Despite his family ties to the Latino community, Bush is off base. The term "anchor baby" is a disgusting slur. It is inaccurate as well as offensive. It is dehumanizing to Latinos, immigrants and children who are as American as you and me.

The idea of an "anchor baby" is centered, in part, on the assumption that having an American-born child can protect undocumented people from deportation. The child, this line of thought goes, "anchors" a family in the United States and allows them to gain citizenship.

In fact, having a citizen child is no protection from possible deportation. In the first six months of 2011, for example, parents with U.S.-citizen children constituted 22% of deportees. Between 2010 and 2012, the United States deported nearly 205,000 parents of citizen kids. And in 2013, more than 72,000 were deported, according to The Huffington Post. (President Barack Obama's executive action plan, which is tied up in the courts, would grant temporary deportation relief to parents of children who meet certain requirements.)

http://www.cnn.com/2015/08/21/opinions/reyes-anchor-babies-slur/index.html

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Sorry Jeb, 'anchor babies' is a slur (Original Post) IDemo Aug 2015 OP
The whole 'anchor baby' meme is a canard thought up by COLGATE4 Aug 2015 #1
That's certainly true. Rozlee Aug 2015 #4
Not to Iowa and NH GOP primary voters and to most of the mass media - it is not! Fred Sanders Aug 2015 #2
Jeb is making a ton of unforced errors Gothmog Aug 2015 #3
Tells us about the daily vocabulary of a certain group, smile. oldandhappy Aug 2015 #5
I'll give you (Jeb) a better term... modrepub Aug 2015 #6
I did not know this was a slur. murielm99 Aug 2015 #7

COLGATE4

(14,732 posts)
1. The whole 'anchor baby' meme is a canard thought up by
Fri Aug 21, 2015, 10:32 AM
Aug 2015

'brilliant' rethugs a la Michelle Malkin, Ann Cooter. It has no basis in reality.

The idea is that foreigners will being the pregnant wife to the US where she gives birth to a US citizen who will later be able to bring his/her parents to the US under an expedited visa process. Thus the term "anchor' babies. Reality however demonstrates the ridiculousness of this idea.

First, for the 'anchor' baby to solicit visas for his/her parents, said baby must be an adult, 21 years of age. So right off the bat, the devious, scheming parents will have to wait at least twenty-one years before even being able to be considered for their visa. Secondly, if the parent(s) are present in the US illegally at the time the baby turns 21, add another ten years to their wait. Law requires they return to their country of origin and stay there 10 years before soliciting a visa to the US. So, in most cases, the 'anchor' baby parents would only have to wait thirty-one years in order to get their 'free' US visa.

Like most Rethug memes, once it's held up to any type of scrutiny in the light of day it just crumbles and vanishes. But as a thirty-second talking point, it's devilishly clever.

Rozlee

(2,529 posts)
4. That's certainly true.
Fri Aug 21, 2015, 01:13 PM
Aug 2015

My family came to the US illegally in the late 1940s to work and only to work. I was born in the early 60s to my shocked 49 year-old mother. I did actually sponsor a foreign national for American citizenship. But, he was Brazilian and a Fulbright scholar who wanted to join his wife in America. He had no problem getting a work visa and getting hired as a contract petroleum engineer. But, I'm the only person I personally know who sponsored a foreign national for citizenship. We're just not lining up to do it.

modrepub

(3,496 posts)
6. I'll give you (Jeb) a better term...
Fri Aug 21, 2015, 03:12 PM
Aug 2015

..how about American Citizen? That's what the constitution (that's probably in your pocket) says.

murielm99

(30,745 posts)
7. I did not know this was a slur.
Fri Aug 21, 2015, 04:17 PM
Aug 2015

I thought it was merely descriptive.

I grew up in a community with a large number of Hispanic people. I knew that American-born children of illegals did not protect their parents. I met some people who were simply proud to have children who were born here.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»Sorry Jeb, 'anchor babies...