Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

deminks

(11,017 posts)
Tue Nov 17, 2015, 07:11 AM Nov 2015

NYT: Confusing refugees with terrorists is morally unacceptable

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/11/17/opinion/after-paris-attacks-vilifying-refugees.html?smid=tw-nytimes&smtyp=cur&_r=1

Battening down the hatches is often an impulsive and politically expedient response to terrorism attacks. Predictably, the harrowing scenes of carnage in Paris on Friday are fueling calls to shut down borders and halt the resettlement of Syrian refugees in Western nations.

Senator Marco Rubio, a leading Republican presidential candidate, said the United States should stop taking in Syrian refugees. Jeb Bush, another Republican candidate, suggested, idiotically, that it might be O.K. to admit only Christians. Several governors announced that their states would not accept Syrian refugees. Republicans on Capitol Hill are expected this week to push for legislation that would block President Obama’s initiative to admit 10,000 Syrian refugees next year.

(snip)

These responses are wrong. Confusing refugees with terrorists is morally unacceptable and, as a matter of strategy, misguided. Stemming the exodus of refugees from Syria must be an important part of any comprehensive plan to end the Syrian war. Building new barriers to keep them out with the absurd argument that Muslims are inherently dangerous could provide propaganda benefits to the Islamic State. The group, also known as ISIS, has drawn recruits around the globe by offering a cause and a home to Muslims who feel marginalized and scorned.

Mr. Obama hit just the right note at the Group of 20 summit meeting in Antalya, Turkey, on Monday. “Many of these refugees are the victims of terrorism themselves, that’s what they’re fleeing,” he said. “Slamming the door in their faces would be a betrayal of our values. Our nations can welcome refugees who are desperately seeking safety and ensure our own security. We can and must do both.”

(snip)

Surely America can offer a smarter and more generous response than Mr. Rubio’s fearmongering. In a televised interview over the weekend, he warned, darkly, that “you can have 1,000 people come in and 999 of them are just poor people fleeing oppression and violence, but one of them is an ISIS fighter.” That’s nonsense. America last year admitted 1,682 Syrian refugees — an embarrassingly small number for the largest refugee crisis since World War II.

(end snip)

11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
NYT: Confusing refugees with terrorists is morally unacceptable (Original Post) deminks Nov 2015 OP
Republicans are showing their true colors C_U_L8R Nov 2015 #1
Yup. Marine Le Pen in France (Front National) and Pegida in Germany Bernardo de La Paz Nov 2015 #3
They're not the only ones. n/t Jefferson23 Nov 2015 #9
Question: world wide wally Nov 2015 #2
Yes, when legally admitted to a receiving country. nt Bernardo de La Paz Nov 2015 #4
In the past couple of weeks, I have noticed... 3catwoman3 Nov 2015 #5
It's a more generalized term. geek tragedy Nov 2015 #10
Funny. The same folks who say we shouldn't judge cops because of a few "bad apples" Midnight Writer Nov 2015 #6
Okay, you nailed it Midnight Writer! monicaangela Nov 2015 #11
knr Douglas Carpenter Nov 2015 #7
Good to see you posting, Douglas. n/t Jefferson23 Nov 2015 #8

C_U_L8R

(45,014 posts)
1. Republicans are showing their true colors
Tue Nov 17, 2015, 09:02 AM
Nov 2015

and unsurprisingly they have a lot in common with French Neo-Nazis.

Repugnant.

3catwoman3

(24,026 posts)
5. In the past couple of weeks, I have noticed...
Tue Nov 17, 2015, 04:25 PM
Nov 2015

...a big increase in the use of the word migrant on the airwaves, rather than immigrant or refugee. I find this curious.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
10. It's a more generalized term.
Thu Nov 19, 2015, 01:03 AM
Nov 2015

People who are moving for economic reasons, for example, aren't refugees.

Midnight Writer

(21,780 posts)
6. Funny. The same folks who say we shouldn't judge cops because of a few "bad apples"
Wed Nov 18, 2015, 12:44 AM
Nov 2015

Insist that we judge millions of Syrian refugees because of exactly one confirmed "bad apple".

monicaangela

(1,508 posts)
11. Okay, you nailed it Midnight Writer!
Thu Nov 19, 2015, 09:00 AM
Nov 2015

I always find the fact that republicans, mostly, appear to talk out of both sides of their mouths. If the situation is in what they consider their favor, the villain can do no wrong. If there is an opportunity to use, abuse, or brutalize what they consider the other, they take advantage of it and attempt to influence the rest of the populace with their negativity. Spot On my friend, as I said, you nailed it!!!!

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»NYT: Confusing refugees...