NYT: Confusing refugees with terrorists is morally unacceptable
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/11/17/opinion/after-paris-attacks-vilifying-refugees.html?smid=tw-nytimes&smtyp=cur&_r=1Battening down the hatches is often an impulsive and politically expedient response to terrorism attacks. Predictably, the harrowing scenes of carnage in Paris on Friday are fueling calls to shut down borders and halt the resettlement of Syrian refugees in Western nations.
Senator Marco Rubio, a leading Republican presidential candidate, said the United States should stop taking in Syrian refugees. Jeb Bush, another Republican candidate, suggested, idiotically, that it might be O.K. to admit only Christians. Several governors announced that their states would not accept Syrian refugees. Republicans on Capitol Hill are expected this week to push for legislation that would block President Obamas initiative to admit 10,000 Syrian refugees next year.
(snip)
These responses are wrong. Confusing refugees with terrorists is morally unacceptable and, as a matter of strategy, misguided. Stemming the exodus of refugees from Syria must be an important part of any comprehensive plan to end the Syrian war. Building new barriers to keep them out with the absurd argument that Muslims are inherently dangerous could provide propaganda benefits to the Islamic State. The group, also known as ISIS, has drawn recruits around the globe by offering a cause and a home to Muslims who feel marginalized and scorned.
Mr. Obama hit just the right note at the Group of 20 summit meeting in Antalya, Turkey, on Monday. Many of these refugees are the victims of terrorism themselves, thats what theyre fleeing, he said. Slamming the door in their faces would be a betrayal of our values. Our nations can welcome refugees who are desperately seeking safety and ensure our own security. We can and must do both.
(snip)
Surely America can offer a smarter and more generous response than Mr. Rubios fearmongering. In a televised interview over the weekend, he warned, darkly, that you can have 1,000 people come in and 999 of them are just poor people fleeing oppression and violence, but one of them is an ISIS fighter. Thats nonsense. America last year admitted 1,682 Syrian refugees an embarrassingly small number for the largest refugee crisis since World War II.
(end snip)
C_U_L8R
(45,014 posts)and unsurprisingly they have a lot in common with French Neo-Nazis.
Repugnant.
Bernardo de La Paz
(49,032 posts)France is holding local elections in two and three weeks.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marine_Le_Pen
Jefferson23
(30,099 posts)world wide wally
(21,751 posts)Is a refugee considered a legal immigrant?
Bernardo de La Paz
(49,032 posts)3catwoman3
(24,026 posts)...a big increase in the use of the word migrant on the airwaves, rather than immigrant or refugee. I find this curious.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)People who are moving for economic reasons, for example, aren't refugees.
Midnight Writer
(21,780 posts)Insist that we judge millions of Syrian refugees because of exactly one confirmed "bad apple".
monicaangela
(1,508 posts)I always find the fact that republicans, mostly, appear to talk out of both sides of their mouths. If the situation is in what they consider their favor, the villain can do no wrong. If there is an opportunity to use, abuse, or brutalize what they consider the other, they take advantage of it and attempt to influence the rest of the populace with their negativity. Spot On my friend, as I said, you nailed it!!!!