Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

flamingdem

(39,328 posts)
Sat Nov 21, 2015, 11:51 AM Nov 2015

The Guardian: Let’s deny Isis its binary struggle – and celebrate the grey zone

http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/nov/20/isis-binary-struggle-grey-zone-jihadism

--- snip


The Guardian: Let’s deny Isis its binary struggle – and celebrate the grey zone

-- snip
Many headed to Syria in 2013, for example, before Isis had established its caliphate or made the descent into outlandish barbarism, having come to the disgusted conclusion that the west was not going to bomb the Assad regime and that, if they wanted to defend Syrians from Assad’s barrel bombs, they would have to do it themselves. Similarly, the 1990s generation was radicalised by the west’s failure to intervene earlier to save Muslim lives in Bosnia.

In other words, attributing Isis terror – or even Isis recruitment – to western action is a temptingly neat explanation, but it fails to account for the fury at western inaction. In the violent jihadist worldview, western intervention has been a provocation – but so has western non-intervention.

What’s more, it’s not just military action that triggers a fierce Isis response. Recall the beheading of the US journalist James Foley. It came after US planes had been circling over the Sinjar mountains of Iraq. Except those aircraft dropped not bombs but food parcels, water supplies and blankets to the desperate Yazidi people then threatened with starvation, the murder of their men and the sexual enslavement of their women.

It seems Isis regards any nation that gets in the way of its caliphate restoration project as a legitimate target – and that’s almost everyone. On this logic, the only way to be safe from its grasp is to do nothing, to repress even our humanitarian impulse to help people dying of cold on a mountainside.
6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Guardian: Let’s deny Isis its binary struggle – and celebrate the grey zone (Original Post) flamingdem Nov 2015 OP
the biggest logical fallacy befalling people who moralize on public policy is geek tragedy Nov 2015 #1
In which case is nothing a good alternative? flamingdem Nov 2015 #2
For a lot of people doing nothing is the default choice and they need geek tragedy Nov 2015 #3
Agree. At least at this point Isis would have gained more territory flamingdem Nov 2015 #5
I'm reminded of No Country for Old Men. geek tragedy Nov 2015 #6
Recommended. HuckleB Nov 2015 #4
 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
1. the biggest logical fallacy befalling people who moralize on public policy is
Sat Nov 21, 2015, 12:20 PM
Nov 2015

failing to recognize that all alternatives, including doing nothing, deserve equal consideration in terms of both the upside and the downside. It is not logical to pick out negative aspects of a particular course of action and conclude the matter decided.

flamingdem

(39,328 posts)
2. In which case is nothing a good alternative?
Sat Nov 21, 2015, 01:49 PM
Nov 2015

I imagine it is but not sure what you're referring to here.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
3. For a lot of people doing nothing is the default choice and they need
Sat Nov 21, 2015, 01:53 PM
Nov 2015

to be persuaded otherwise. I do not subscribe to this point of view.

flamingdem

(39,328 posts)
5. Agree. At least at this point Isis would have gained more territory
Sat Nov 21, 2015, 02:03 PM
Nov 2015

without those airstrikes. Containment is better than expansion for sure.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
6. I'm reminded of No Country for Old Men.
Sat Nov 21, 2015, 02:05 PM
Nov 2015

Where Anton the hit man asks the old man to call the coin flip heads or tails (if he calls it wrong, he gets killed).

When the old man asks what he has to win, the answer is "everything."

If you can stop ISIS from taking land, that's better than having to win it back.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles» The Guardian: Let’s deny...