Bad Business: Billions of Taxpayer Dollars Wasted on Hiring Contractors
Executive Summary
Based on the current public debate regarding the salary comparisons of federal and private sector employees, the Project On Government Oversight (POGO)[1] decided to take on the task of doing what others have notcomparing total annual compensation for federal and private sector employees with federal contractor billing rates in order to determine whether the current costs of federal service contracting serves the public interest.
The current debate over pay differentials largely relies on the theory that the government pays private sector compensation rates when it outsources services. This report proves otherwise: in fact, it shows that the government actually pays service contractors at rates far exceeding the cost of employing federal employees to perform comparable functions.
POGOs study analyzed the total compensation paid to federal and private sector employees, and annual billing rates for contractor employees across 35 occupational classifications covering over 550 service activities. Our findings were shockingPOGO estimates the government pays billions more annually in taxpayer dollars to hire contractors than it would to hire federal employees to perform comparable services. Specifically, POGOs study shows that the federal government approves service contract billing ratesdeemed fair and reasonablethat pay contractors 1.83 times more than the government pays federal employees in total compensation, and more than 2 times the total compensation paid in the private sector for comparable services.
Additional key findings include:
Federal government employees were less expensive than contractors in 33 of the 35 occupational classifications POGO reviewed.
In one instance, contractor billing rates were nearly 5 times more than the full compensation paid to federal employees performing comparable services.
Private sector compensation was lower than contractor billing rates in all 35 occupational classifications we reviewed.
The federal government has failed to determine how much money it saves or wastes by outsourcing, insourcing, or retaining services, and has no system for doing so.
POGOs investigation highlights two basic facts about outsourcing government work to contractors. First, comparing federal to private sector compensation reveals nothing about what it actually costs the government to outsource services. The only analysis that will shed light on the true costs of government is that of contractor billing rates and the full cost of employing federal employees to perform comparable work. The Commission on Wartime Contracting in Iraq and Afghanistan recently completed a fundamental study of costs, and found that, in certain contingency operations, although savings resulted from hiring local or third-country nationals, military and civilian employees cost less than hiring American contractors.
more
http://www.pogo.org/our-work/reports/2011/co-gp-20110913.html
Response to n2doc (Original post)
47of74 This message was self-deleted by its author.
daybranch
(1,309 posts)It is very clear to government employees that taking jobs with contractors pay much more. Here close to Wright Patterson Air Force Base in Dayton, Ohio, you can actually see the huge increases in pay federal employees gain as they goto work as contractor employees. Contractor employees just make more for the same work, no matter how much the contractor siphons off. You see the increases in wages in new cars for themselves and their wives, and then they buy a more expensive house and move to more expensive neighborhoods.
msongs
(67,453 posts)Scuba
(53,475 posts)The Polack MSgt
(13,198 posts)As being indicative of every situation, but I have to step in to this discussion.
I am a DOD contracted employee.
I have been filling technical analysis/staff functions since shortly after my retirement and I would like to highlight a few things I've seen in the past 10 years.
I have no experience with other branches of the US Government, but in the DOD contractors are paid at rates that closely mirror what an active military officer or NCO would make in the same position.
If the desk you occupy has a function that would be associated with a Lieutenant Colonel/Commander or Colonel/Captain you will be compensated at that level (+ or - a few %). Senior NCO and WO level positions are much the same.
The mythical savings that contractors are supposed to provide come from a couple of areas:
Geographic stability. We don't need to be moved every few years because of Service requirements or as part of our professional development the way that Military Members do. No PCS costs, no need to train and retrain to keep the function operating.
Ease of down sizing or altering the work force.
We do not have the processes in place that make our removal difficult. We are not as protected as federal employees or active duty military. If the contract manager doesn't feel that a contractor is doing well in a position they can be removed relatively quickly - Then the company has the hassle of having to fire the removed person and deal with any repercussions (wrongful termination suit or EEOC complaint).
Also, every 2 or three years the contracting office reselects companies for each functional area. Lowest bidder deemed technically capable wins. The Contractors in place usually have 2 choices when this occurs 1- Quit and find other work or 2- Keep the job you have and take a pay cut.
I was told that my position was to be "insourced" years ago because it would've been more efficient for many regulatory reasons - but all of that died during the budget circle jerk of the last 6 years.