Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kristopher

(29,798 posts)
Tue Jan 19, 2016, 01:53 AM Jan 2016

A big-shot venture capitalist says we need inequality. What do economists say?

A big-shot venture capitalist says we need inequality. What do economists say?
By Jim Tankersley January 14



SAN FRANCISCO – There is an apartment for rent in a renovated former warehouse here, across the street from the Caltrain commuter rail station. It has two bedrooms and two bathrooms and nearly 700 square feet of space. It comes furnished. It is, the online advertisement proclaims, a "perfect place" for someone, like so many young startup employees today, who works in Silicon Valley but lives in the city. It could be yours for $8,525 a month.

Rents get more bearable in farther flung parts of the city, and in bedroom communities down the Peninsula, but only slightly. A deluge of cash has soaked the engineers and executives of the Bay Area, pushing up home prices and leaving San Francisco with levels of income inequality typically seen in developing nations.

Paul Graham, a venture capitalist and one of the founders of the startup incubator Y Combinator, would have you believe this rising inequality is a good thing. Or, at very worst, the inevitable consequence of a good thing. "You can't prevent great variations in wealth without preventing people from getting rich," he wrote in an essay that went viral online last week, "and you can't do that without preventing them from starting startups."

Graham's piece happened to light up the Internet just as thousands of economists descended on San Francisco for the annual conference of the American Economic Association. The drizzly three days of the gathering featured what appears to have been the largest focus on inequality in the organization's history. The 70 inequality-themed papers presented here wove a nest of new research demonstrating how and why inequality has increased, and what side effects appear to have accompanied it.

Taken together, they make the case that Graham -- and others who wave off inequality as inconsequential -- has misread what's happened in the American economy. They suggest that everyone should worry about the drivers and consequences of inequality -- even venture capitalists....

More at: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2016/01/14/what-silicon-valley-doesnt-understand-about-inequality/
3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
A big-shot venture capitalist says we need inequality. What do economists say? (Original Post) kristopher Jan 2016 OP
HE needs inequality. That's how he keeps his Ponzi scheme going Warpy Jan 2016 #1
kinda like how slave-holders maintained there "needs" to be masters and slaves phantom power Jan 2016 #2
+1 kristopher Jan 2016 #3

Warpy

(111,352 posts)
1. HE needs inequality. That's how he keeps his Ponzi scheme going
Tue Jan 19, 2016, 01:56 AM
Jan 2016

by promising great returns to men with much more money than brains.

phantom power

(25,966 posts)
2. kinda like how slave-holders maintained there "needs" to be masters and slaves
Tue Jan 19, 2016, 11:00 AM
Jan 2016

and the nobility used to maintain there "needs" to be royalty, and their serfs.

Or there "needs" to be Britain and its colonies...

Gee, really Paul? did you think that up all by yourself?

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»A big-shot venture capita...