Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

MBS

(9,688 posts)
Thu Jan 21, 2016, 11:00 PM Jan 2016

Robert Bateman (Esquire): what "probably" means in Litvinenko-Putin-poison story

http://www.esquire.com/news-politics/politics/news/a41388/vladimir-putin-alexander-litvinenko-death/

. . . .Why "probably", one might ask? Why not call the findings "inconclusive?" The answer is simple; you just need to understand Brit-speak. (As Churchill once said of the U.K. and the U.S., "We are two people separated by a common language.&quot

In Britain, "probably" is nearly the opposite of "inconclusive." This statement says the equivalent of, "You definitely did this, you pissant Putin, but I am too refined to say 'definitely' because I want to leave wiggle-room for my country."

In 2006, when Litvinenko died, Putin was riding high. Hubris has a way with rulers, . (Just try to convince me that Putin was fairly elected.) They think they are allowed to do anything. That's the difference between "rulers" and elected leaders. There is only one thing more dangerous than a ruler with hubris: one who feels threatened.

Putin is both.


Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»Robert Bateman (Esquire):...