Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

antigop

(12,778 posts)
Sun Feb 21, 2016, 11:43 PM Feb 2016

Hillary Clinton, Corporate America and the Democrats' Dilemma

http://www.truth-out.org/opinion/item/34913-with-hillary-clinton-corporate-america-defines-the-limits-of-acceptable-opinion

A party beholden to corporate power cannot simultaneously be the party of ordinary working people, and thus we can see the Democrats' dilemma. Though the party distinguishes itself from the GOP in some ways - Democrats are more liberal on social issues, for example, and more inclined to defend programs like Medicare and Social Security - there can be no question that corporate money has undue influence on both major parties, not just the GOP. When Hillary Clinton was seen as the inevitable 2016 Democratic nominee, there was no reason to believe this status quo would be challenged. But the rise of Bernie Sanders changes everything.

The genius of the corporate coup that has overtaken US democracy is not that it dominates the GOP - the party that has long favored corporate power anyway - but that it has maneuvered even the opposition party into submission as well. The brightest minds on Wall Street are experts at hedging bets, and they play politics just as they play finance. Such dynamics are key to understanding not only the role of the Clinton candidacy in the eyes of corporate America, but the perceived threat posed by the Sanders campaign with its persistent advocacy for people over corporations.

Clinton, who once served on the board of Walmart, the gold standard of predatory corporatism, is so tight with corporate power that she's now making efforts to downplay her relationships. CNBC reports that she is postponing fundraisers with Wall Street executives, no doubt concerned that voters are awakening to the toxic influence of corporations on politics and government. Already in the awkward position of explaining six-figure checks from Wall Street firms for speaking engagements and large charitable donations from major banks, Clinton realizes that she must try to distance herself from her corporate benefactors.

And the fat cats fully understand. "Don't expect folks on Wall Street to be offended that Clinton is distancing herself from them," CNBC reports. "In fact, they see it as smart politics and they understand that Wall Street banks are deeply unpopular."


3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Hillary Clinton, Corporate America and the Democrats' Dilemma (Original Post) antigop Feb 2016 OP
Potent insight SHRED Feb 2016 #1
Even Richard Nixon was scared of being labeled "Big Business". Fuddnik Feb 2016 #2
"some politicians followers will deny reality and try to justify it with the flimsiest of excuses. " antigop Feb 2016 #3

Fuddnik

(8,846 posts)
2. Even Richard Nixon was scared of being labeled "Big Business".
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 06:20 AM
Feb 2016

Of course he was, but the perception could cause him a lot of grief trying to implement his Big Business agenda.

The difference now is, some politicians feel no shame, and consider it business as usual. The sad thing is that now some politicians followers will deny reality and try to justify it with the flimsiest of excuses.

When renowned bank robber Willie Sutton was asked why he robbed banks, he said "Because that's where the money is". Nowadays, politicians grovel for corporate donations "because that's where the money is". One of the reasons we have to get 100% publicly financed elections is because politicians spend most of their time begging for money for their re-election, and the peoples business is rarely discussed and never acted on.

antigop

(12,778 posts)
3. "some politicians followers will deny reality and try to justify it with the flimsiest of excuses. "
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 11:10 AM
Feb 2016

I would add that some (not all) followers actually benefit from the Big Business agenda.

Or they haven't been burned (yet) by the Big Business agenda.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»Hillary Clinton, Corporat...