How Dixie Rules the GOP
How Dixie Rules the GOP
Posted on Feb 29, 2016
By E.J. Dionne Jr.
The Super Tuesday primaries underscore how super Southern our presidential nominating process has become. This makes our way of picking standard-bearers unrepresentative of the country as a whole. In particular, it sharply reduces the influence of the great American Midwest even though the regions states are among the most important general-election battlegrounds.
Southernization is a special problem for Republicans because their Southern supporters tend to be far more socially conservative than the rest of the party or the country. Southern politics is also more deeply polarized around race, giving backlash candidates a leg up. The GOPs slide rightward creates electoral difficulties for it in presidential elections and is the central factor in Washingtons inability to find consensus on much of anything.
True, the whole carnival starts in Iowa, which is as Midwestern as you can get. But the caucus system gives more conservative Iowa Republicans an outsized influence because white evangelicals play a disproportionate role in what is a relatively low-turnout contest.
It is to the evangelicals credit as democratic citizens that they organize, mobilize and participate. But their civic virtuousness only makes the final result less reflective of opinion in the party, in Iowa itself and elsewhere.
More:
The Super Tuesday primaries underscore how super Southern our presidential nominating process has become. This makes our way of picking standard-bearers unrepresentative of the country as a whole. In particular, it sharply reduces the influence of the great American Midwest even though the regions states are among the most important general-election battlegrounds.
Southernization is a special problem for Republicans because their Southern supporters tend to be far more socially conservative than the rest of the party or the country. Southern politics is also more deeply polarized around race, giving backlash candidates a leg up. The GOPs slide rightward creates electoral difficulties for it in presidential elections and is the central factor in Washingtons inability to find consensus on much of anything.
True, the whole carnival starts in Iowa, which is as Midwestern as you can get. But the caucus system gives more conservative Iowa Republicans an outsized influence because white evangelicals play a disproportionate role in what is a relatively low-turnout contest.
It is to the evangelicals credit as democratic citizens that they organize, mobilize and participate. But their civic virtuousness only makes the final result less reflective of opinion in the party, in Iowa itself and elsewhere.
More:
http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/how_dixie_rules_the_gop_20160229
underpants
(182,878 posts)elljay
(1,178 posts)The conservative southern states largely supported Hillary, even though she is unlikely to get their electoral votes in the general election. Those of us who live in reliably Democratic states (I live in California) are pushed to the end of the process. The media are already proclaiming the race over. Sorry, but having lived in both Georgia and California, I can safely say that Democrats in both states have different perspectives. If the idea is to find the strongest national candidate, let the Blue States decide, not the Red. Take us for granted long enough and we will stay home.