Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Baobab

(4,667 posts)
Thu Mar 24, 2016, 04:10 PM Mar 2016

Contrary to popular perceptions, taxpayers fund 64 percent of U.S. health care, more public dollars

Government funds nearly two-thirds of U.S. health care costs: American Journal of Public Health study
Contrary to popular perceptions, taxpayers fund 64 percent of U.S. health care, more public dollars per capita than the citizens of other nations – including those with universal health programs.

http://ajph.aphapublications.org/doi/full/10.2105/AJPH.2015.302997


Objectives. We estimated taxpayers’ current and projected share of US health expenditures, including government payments for public employees’ health benefits as well as tax subsidies to private health spending.

Methods. We tabulated official Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services figures on direct government spending for health programs and public employees’ health benefits for 2013, and projected figures through 2024. We calculated the value of tax subsidies for private spending from official federal budget documents and figures for state and local tax collections.

Results. Tax-funded health expenditures totaled $1.877 trillion in 2013 and are projected to increase to $3.642 trillion in 2024. Government’s share of overall health spending was 64.3% of national health expenditures in 2013 and will rise to 67.1% in 2024. Government health expenditures in the United States account for a larger share of gross domestic product (11.2% in 2013) than do total health expenditures in any other nation.

Conclusions. Contrary to public perceptions and official Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services estimates, government funds most health care in the United States. Appreciation of government’s predominant role in health funding might encourage more appropriate and equitable targeting of health expenditures.

8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

Scuba

(53,475 posts)
1. We already pay for Medicare for All, but our corrupt system diverts money to for-profit insurance.
Thu Mar 24, 2016, 04:13 PM
Mar 2016

This is no secret. Take a look at who big insurance is backing.

Baobab

(4,667 posts)
4. Self pay, not everybody can self pay, but it makes a LOT of sense to do that if you want honesty.
Thu Mar 24, 2016, 04:36 PM
Mar 2016

Last edited Thu Mar 24, 2016, 08:47 PM - Edit history (1)

Paying your own bill directly in cash or check -

means that then you get a level of HONESTY which doctors in insurance plans are now often prohibited in giving to the insurance companies patients.

if they discuss anything the insurance company doesnt want to pay for they could get delisted. basically, the insurance companies can delist doctors at any time, for no reason at all. they have absolutely no appeal process. So doctors have to get pre-approval before ordering a test or even in some cases even before taking on a new patient, I think.

my information on physician gag clauses comes from two doctor friends I have who i used to see often but now live on the opposite coast from, and its more than ten years old now.



Baobab

(4,667 posts)
5. there are web sites where you can bid on things and get cheaper prices in a a-la-carte
Thu Mar 24, 2016, 04:41 PM
Mar 2016

manner.

But you have to be uninsured to do that. if you have insurance they have to try to use it. So if you have crappy insurance that has been set up so you are basically forced into getting crappy care.

Class-mixing is FORBIDDEN.

Thats because people of different classes get profoundly different care now. They dont conceal that well, but they try to and its surprising how many people seriously think that they can pay a few hundred bucks a month and get care thats the equivalent of a fee for service plan or self pay. its not, its not even close.

have people ever heard the phrase "differential diagnosis"? thats what 'defensive medicine' used to be called (its what a dotor is supposed to do to figure out what is wrong with somebody who presents with an unknown illness. basically its what House - the TV show is about- that kind of medicine is now denigrated and demonised by health insurers) and its basically modern medicine as it should be practiced and is practiced in most of the world.

people perhaps used to be more hip to the fact that mediine varied a lot from town to town and state to state. And in different practices and communities within a town but also a doctors freedom to be a doctor varies drmatically depending on the patients insurance coverage.

I know that many people covered by a specific very large US MCO became aware of how bad they were becoming 9even though in the press they were constantly the subject of adulation for their 'high quality care' people became aware of individuals who had been killed by medical mistakes caused by the practices of these chains.) So it was my understanding that many people used to pretend to be uninsured and go out of network and several towns away - or to a different country! - when they were sure they were sick but their in network doctor was capitated and was not being helpful. And many people still do that. they go elsewhere for tests and they go elsewhere for resolving things they feel they need that they are not getting. imaging under some MCOs is difficult to get.

And sometimes indeed it would turn out that they had some serious illness. And then bizarre things ensued.

this is why they are trying to dumb down the entre health care system, including the more expensive PPOs-

MCOs hate it when people can go out of network and get a second opinion, that breaks everything for them.

D Gary Grady

(133 posts)
7. When mentioned this out to a life-long conservative a few months ago...
Thu Mar 24, 2016, 06:20 PM
Mar 2016

... I got an unexpected reaction. I gave him links showing

a. The per capita cost of tax-funded healthcare in the U.S.

b. The per capita TOTAL cost of healthcare in other major countries (that is, the combined cost of public insurance, private insurance, and out-of-pocket spending by individuals).

And I pointed out that the latter numbers were smaller than the former number. That is, if we could import one of those foreign systems, several of which have better health outcomes than ours, then the government could fund 100% of all healthcare spending and have money left over.

His response, which surprised me, was that we need to pick one of those systems and hire the people who run it to come over here and set up their system in the United States.

There's a broader point here, which is that people *DO* sometimes listen to reason, especially if you explain things to them calmly and clearly without starting out telling them they're idiots. (Yes, do as I say, not as I do...)

Baobab

(4,667 posts)
8. We do, Ive often thought that too. But here's the problem
Thu Mar 24, 2016, 08:20 PM
Mar 2016

We've set up this alternative reality here in the US where we believe that we're all still in the drivers seat but the reality is, they sold us out and when it dodnt stick as well as they hoped, now they are trying literally like crazy to lock us in to these deals that literally give away our rights to set our own healthcare policy to corporations.

That isnt a typo.

they have promised companies from lots of other countries those potentially millions of "overpaid" healthcare and education and IT jobs if they are the lowest qualified bidders.

After all, "its an emergency", right?

You have to stop thinking the way they want us to think and see it in the cold hard light of the facts and possible motives.

And utter lack of morality.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»Contrary to popular perce...