How Much Does Bernie Sanders Know About Policy?
The Democratic presidential hopeful had a rough interview with the New York Daily News editorial board, struggling to explain what he would do to break up the banks and more if elected.Throughout his interview, Sanders seemed taken aback when he was pressed on policyand not just on the matters that are peripheral to his approach, like the Israeli-Palestinian conflict or interrogation of detainees, but even on bread-and-butter matters like breaking up the big banks, the Democratic presidential hopeful came across as tentative, unprepared, or unaware.
Its striking that there hasnt been more coverage of Sanderss policy ideas so far during the campaign, even at this late date, with most of the primary season concluded. Hes even acquired a reputation as something of a wonk, the kind of guy who eschews soaring rhetoric for dry nuts and bolts on the stumpand gets people to love him anyway. The gaps uncovered by the Daily News are not just about pragmatism. (There have, of course, been plenty of accusations, not least from Hillary Clintons campaign, that Sanders is offering a deeply unrealistic program. He tends to answer that they fail to grasp that he is building a political revolution.) The question here is not how Sanders would enact policies, but what those policies would be. If the Sanders campaign has shied away from deep dives into policy, this interview might be why: The candidate reveals himself as a far defter diagnostician than clinician.
The most glaring example came early in the encounter, during a discussion of the problem of too big to fail banks. There is disagreement among economists on the left over how important, if at all, it is to break up large financial institutions. The board granted Sanderss argument and asked him how hed do it, producing an excruciating cat-and-mouse game...
Sanders is the candidate of first principles. Thats a phenomenon thats been on display repeatedly during the Democratic debates, especially on matters of foreign policy. On the one hand, theres Hillary Clinton, who has an encyclopedic knowledge of the Middle East, but also backed the war in Iraq, thus botching the most important foreign-policy decision since Vietnam. On the other hand, theres Sanders, whose answers about the Middle East are often opaquesee his call for a Muslim army to defeat ISISbut whose gut led him to the correct decision on Iraq. Democratic voters may have to choose whether they prefer Clintons poor judgment or Sanderss ignorance.
The latter was on display at the Daily News during an exchange about the peace process. Could he describe the pullback of Israeli settlements in the West Bank he has encouraged? No: I'm not going to run the Israeli government. I've got enough problems trying to be a United States senator or maybe President of the United States.
A moment later, he was asked why he didnt support Palestinians using the International Criminal Court to try to prosecute Israeli leaders. Look, why don't I support a million things in the world? I'm just telling you that I happen to believe, the exasperated senator replied...
http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2016/04/bernie-sanderss-rough-ride-with-the-daily-news/476919/
zalinda
(5,621 posts)Bernie will choose people who think like he does to change the way the government works. He has shown he has good judgement. In order to be a leader, you don't have to know the nuts and bolts, but you have to have someone who knows how the nuts and bolts go together. He has over 100 economists who can help him achieve his vision.
Hillary will choose people who have served in the government and big business for decades. She has shown poor judgement. She seems to want to do what she wants to do, advice be damned. In order to be a leader, you have to listen to experts who know what they are doing. She seems to think like Obama, and to be honest, very little has changed in the working and poor class under Obama.
Z
Fast Walker 52
(7,723 posts)for helping people and avoiding unnecessary wars.
Baobab
(4,667 posts)Sanders clearly puts ability and loyalty to the people- as in "of by and for the people", first.
Schema Thing
(10,283 posts)or his warnings about the Iraq war. Or his many policy successes in congress.
BeyondGeography
(39,377 posts)and how he would do it.
Schema Thing
(10,283 posts)wow, look up there, I just prescribed a gargantuan improvement in US policy!
BeyondGeography
(39,377 posts)This after extensive consultations on the topic. Bernie's go-it-alone style apparently leaves him a little overwhelmed on that front.
Schema Thing
(10,283 posts)both executive and legislative leadership and accomplishment.
So, y'know, stop lying. That's an order.
BeyondGeography
(39,377 posts)you've obviously been doing more talking than listening. Not a proud moment in his long record of executive accomplishment, especially since he has been talking about the topic for many years.
Baobab
(4,667 posts)For example, neither Obama nor Hillary told us the real reason our health care policy is so screwed up.
A 1995 trade deal.
kristopher
(29,798 posts)Baobab
(4,667 posts)policies. that actually ties his hands. but you can tell that he knows about them and the choices of what he does do - what IS within the realm of what he can do is PRETEND THOSE DEALS DO NOT EXIST -
Which is a legitimate approach since the country has never been told about them, in my opinion that makes them ILLEGITIMATE.
Blue Meany
(1,947 posts)Hillary Clinton has scores of people to digest and simplify issues for her, suggest responses, and write talking points about them that she clearly memorizes, and she has for a long time. She sounds informed, and for any issue you ask about she's got a plan with bullet points, but if she were seriously questioned about them it would become clear that it is just a list of talking points to make her sound informed and prepared. I don't mean to single her out; almost all politicians do this. But her plans wont really change anything significantly, even if they were enacted, and, in any case, good laws and policies are not made ahead of time with a preset list of actions to check off. Rather they come through study of the problems, hearings, negotiations, etc.
I, for one, am glade that Bernie to set out a set of steps to break up banks, but rather laid out a general direction he wants to take the country. It is better to leave the details to experts who know what they are doing then lay out a plan that become a campaign promise. As Hillary Clinton ironically stated when she was asked about whether NAFTA was a success, "You'll have to ask the experts about that."