David Ignatius: Sec. Moniz' important progress on energy issues
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/the-next-president-must-keep-advancing-our-quiet-revolution-in-clean-energy/2016/04/05/3b4f4e48-fb47-11e5-80e4-c381214de1a3_story.html?wpmm=1&wpisrc=nl_opinionsEnergy Secretary Ernest Moniz, arguably President Obamas best Cabinet appointment, has been leading a quiet revolution in clean-energy technology. Innovation is transforming this industry, costs are plummeting and entrepreneurs are devising radical new systems that create American jobs in addition to protecting the planet.
The leading GOP candidates, Donald Trump and Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Tex.), offer know-nothing denials of this march of science. Trump told The Post last month that all thats happening is a change in weather. I am not a great believer in man-made climate change. Cruz told an audience in New Hampshire in January that climate change is the perfect pseudoscientific theory, propounded by big-government politician[s]. If either is elected president, you have to assume he will try to gut clean-energy programs.
Heres a suggestion for any fact-based, technology-respecting candidate in either party: Promise that, if elected, youll try to persuade Moniz to remain in place. A Massachusetts Institute of Technology physicist by training, he has proved to be one of this administrations most skillful players, as illustrated by his decisive, behind-the-scenes role in the Iran nuclear talks.
. . .
This political season has been a horror show, making even those who are optimistic about Americas future begin to wonder. Monizs innovation summit was a bracing reminder of why, as Warren Buffett likes to say, people have never gone wrong betting on America. It also illustrates the importance of having world-class scientists such as Moniz oversee the intersection of government and technology.
kristopher
(29,798 posts)Bernie is entitled to his Pick for Energy Sec.
MBS
(9,688 posts)Which he has.
He (along with Kerry, and the fact that Kerry and Moniz have worked so constructively and synergistically together) is a key reason why we have an Iran deal.
kristopher
(29,798 posts)He is following a bad strategy that serves corporate interests more than it seeks to solve the carbon problem.
We need a Moon Shot program to build out a new renewable energy infrastructure in less than 10 years. Moniz pushes the "all of the above" energy strategy that is designed to preserve the completely unnecessary coal and nuclear industries.
The Moon Shot approach would give us a more reliable, ultra low carbon energy system for about the same out of pocket that people pay now, and it would provide a tremendous number of good paying, permanent, domestic jobs. (Renewables have no fuel costs but they are much more labor intensive with costs roughly balancing out).
No, Bernie gets his own energy secretary.
MBS
(9,688 posts)We just disagree about Moniz' contributions.
Whatever you think about his "all of the above" strategy (and I do think that you don't give him nearly enough credit for progress on the renewable energy front), Moniz does deserve serious props for his role in the Iran deal, where his scientific competence and diplomatic skills (really! Knowing that his Iranian counterpart went to MIT and was also about to become a grandparent, he thought to acquire for his Iranian colleague a onesie with an MIT logo. .) were key to the deal's success. Moniz and Kerry went out of their way to treat their negotiating partners like actual human beings, and it paid off. Plus they both went out of their way to give credit to each other, and to their teams. These are good people who made something good happen, against very steep odds. And I, for one, am grateful to both of them.
kristopher
(29,798 posts)...hardly a reason to lionize him. My priority is climate change. The primary mission of the DOE since before it was the DOE is the management of our nuclear weapons R&D and maintenance. They've expanded into civilian energy issues but the focus is still on nuclear matters. Important to be sure but right now the threat of climate change has to take priority.
One reason I'm behind Sanders is that I'm sure he also views climate change as the number 1 threat to us all. I also see his revolutionary view of how to threaten Congress is the strategy most likely to move us forward. Obama had the right desire, but he wasn't able to go toe to toe with the Congressional Republicans. I think Bernie can.