Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

elleng

(130,976 posts)
Mon Apr 11, 2016, 05:32 AM Apr 2016

Panama Papers Leak Signals a Shift in Mainstream Journalism.

'Four years passed between The New York Times’s first article based on the Pentagon Papers and the end of the Vietnam War.

Two years passed between The Washington Post’s first story establishing Richard M. Nixon’s link to the Watergate burglary and Nixon’s resignation from the presidency.

Last week, Prime Minister Sigmundur David Gunnlaugsson of Iceland couldn’t make it 48 hours before having to step aside after the disclosure of the shady bank dealings contained in the Panama Papers, some of which involve him. . .

Because while we Americans were transfixed by the latest plot turns in our presidential campaign, you and the rest of the world were living through the biggest corporate data leak in history. It had reverberations not only in Iceland, but in China, Britain, Russia, Argentina and some 50 other countries.

But the leak signaled something else that was a big deal but went unheralded: The official WikiLeaks-ization of mainstream journalism; the next step in the tentative merger between the Fourth Estate, with its relatively restrained conventional journalists, and the Fifth Estate, with the push-the-limits ethos of its blogger, hacker and journo-activist cohort, in the era of gargantuan data breaches.

Back at the dawn of this new, Big Breach journalism, The Times’s then-executive editor, Bill Keller, wondered aloud in the paper’s Sunday magazine whether “The War Logs,” a huge cache of confidential war records and diplomatic cables published by WikiLeaks in conjunction with The Times, Der Spiegel, The Guardian and others, represented “some kind of cosmic triumph of transparency.” He concluded, “I suspect we have not reached a state of information anarchy, at least not yet.” That was in 2011.


Five years later, it is safe to say that we are getting much closer. This is changing the course of world history, fast. It is also changing the rules for mainstream journalists in the fierce business of unearthing secrets, and for the government and corporate officials in the fiercer business of keeping them.'>>>

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/04/11/business/media/panama-papers-leak-signals-a-shift-in-mainstream-journalism.html?


Faster than a speeding bullet! It's a bird, it's a plane, it's SUPER WOODSTEIN!!!

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Panama Papers Leak Signals a Shift in Mainstream Journalism. (Original Post) elleng Apr 2016 OP
good EdwardBernays Apr 2016 #1
Amen to that nikto Apr 2016 #2
...and maybe a shift for M$M? Equinox Moon Apr 2016 #3
Even NPR and PBS realize their 6-figure salaries can go back to 5-figure without large donors. Festivito Apr 2016 #4
Media outlets choose to collaborate or not for various reasons... Blue_Tires Apr 2016 #6
Oh I think we are there. bemildred Apr 2016 #5

Equinox Moon

(6,344 posts)
3. ...and maybe a shift for M$M?
Mon Apr 11, 2016, 07:56 AM
Apr 2016

Last edited Mon Apr 11, 2016, 09:34 AM - Edit history (1)

UPDATE: Link for NPR podcast (17-min)
http://www.npr.org/podcasts/452538775/on-the-media
4/6/2016 - Behind the Panama Papers
from 14 min to end (17min) is about the American news media not collaborating

*************
NPR did a long radio report yesterday including discussion on how M$M was not in on it and did not report on it. Something to do with M$M not willing to be part of global collaboration. (not team players)

It was an interview with the international journalists that made the massive leak public.

Fascinating report about a consortium of 400 journalists worldwide working online collaboratively and keeping it quiet for an entire year.

I will look for a link to the NPR interview.

Festivito

(13,452 posts)
4. Even NPR and PBS realize their 6-figure salaries can go back to 5-figure without large donors.
Mon Apr 11, 2016, 08:42 AM
Apr 2016

And, what do those very large donors want? Just to be quiet on occasion and not report some story here and there when the order comes down from on high. It just looks like an inside administrative decision.

But, is it?

Blue_Tires

(55,445 posts)
6. Media outlets choose to collaborate or not for various reasons...
Mon Apr 11, 2016, 12:52 PM
Apr 2016

on the flipside, there are plenty of instances where outlets with a genuine interest in collaborating get shut out (i.e., Snowden/Greenwald)

bemildred

(90,061 posts)
5. Oh I think we are there.
Mon Apr 11, 2016, 11:50 AM
Apr 2016

It's not going to get better. They won't eventually get a handle on it. It's an arms race now, and the hackers have the advantage. There are vast quantities of hastily assembled software out there which everybody uses and depends on, and more all the time. And it will all get examined in minute detail by somebody looking for a flaw.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»Panama Papers Leak Signal...