Techies for Bernie: why some best-paid workers are supporting a socialist
Bernie Sanders is seeing a surge of support from well-off, leftwing staff at tech firms such as Apple and Google. Is it because they can see the game is rigged?
For the first time in a long time, its fun to be a member of the American left. A socialist is within spitting distance of the White House. Bernie Sanders may not win the nomination, but his extraordinary primary run has proven the mainstream viability of leftwing politics in a country thats spent decades drifting to the right.
The core pieces of the coalition thats made his achievement possible are well-known from exit polls: millennials, lower-income Americans, and independents. But Bernies also benefited from another, more surprising bloc of support, one that may prove just as important to the future of American leftism: tech workers.
According to analysis of Federal Election Commission (FEC) filings by the Center for Responsive Politics, four of the top five employers of Sanders donors are tech companies. Google is number one, its employees having contributed more than $200,000. Microsoft, Apple and Amazon occupy the third, fourth and fifth spots respectively. Hillary Clinton, by contrast, has no tech companies in her top five, and only one in her top 20.
Sanders also appears to be receiving far more individual contributions from tech workers than Clinton. A software engineer and Sanders supporter named Bill Schaller used the FEC filings to produce a pair of pie charts that break both sets of contributors down by occupation. Technology and education are the leading fields among Sanders donors, while Clintons are legal and retirees.
Momentum behind Sanders in tech is growing. Cont'd >>>
http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/apr/18/bernie-sanders-techies-support-socialism-capitalism
hereforthevoting
(241 posts)Sense on net neutrality.
zalinda
(5,621 posts)vkkv
(3,384 posts)Clickbait, perhaps?
Igel
(35,317 posts)The last few revolutions I've seriously considered have two kinds of supporters.
Those who benefit materially from it. They believe that the revolution can only, obligatorily, make things better for them. They're convinced they're the vast majority, whatever the statistics may say, and society will be restructured to help them (which is only proper, considering how important they are).
The others are those who benefit emotionally or intellectually from it. It's the "right thing to do." Usually they think they'll benefit from it, often having a much larger say (which is only proper, considering how important they are) but usually being wealthier or better educated as the system is restructured they find that they're in a bind. To just tread water they are called to do things they won't like, and in the end most sink because in an economy restructured for the underprivileged, they're privileged. At best, they're tools. At worst, useful idiots.
Or the "revolution" rhetoric is nothing more than rhetoric.
Still, most of it is a ploy to get more power, in a society that values power and wealth over cohesion and cooperation, for all the rhetoric to the contrary.