India drought: '330 million people affected'
20 April 2016
At least 330 million people are affected by drought in India, the government has told the Supreme Court
The drought is taking place as a heat wave extends across much of India with temperatures crossing 40C for days now.
An 11-year-old girl died of heatstroke while collecting water from a village pump in the western Maharashtra state.
Yogita Desai had spent close to four hours in 42C temperatures gathering water from the pump on Sunday, local journalist Manoj Sapte told the BBC.
She began vomiting after returning home and was rushed to hospital, but died early on Monday.
Yogita's death certificate says she died of heatstroke and dehydration.
The pump was a mere 500m from her house, but a typical wait for water stretches into hours.
In water-scarce Orissa, farmers have reportedly breached embankments to save their crops.
Water availability in India's 91 reservoirs is at its lowest in a decade, with stocks at a paltry 29% of their total storage capacity, according to the Central Water Commission.
Some 85% of the country's drinking water comes from aquifers, but their levels are falling, according to WaterAid.
Full article: http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-36089377
Mojorabbit
(16,020 posts)Baobab
(4,667 posts)So we can together solve problems.
War mongerers should be locked up.
polly7
(20,582 posts)With the atrocities we've already seen to control fossil fuels and other resources, I don't see peace in the plans for helping these people at all. imho.
Saturday, 05 March 2016 00:00
By Papri Sri Raman, Truthout | News Analysis
http://www.truth-out.org/news/item/35029-india-s-water-war-city-workers-fight-corporate-privatization-efforts
http://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2015/jan/30/water-privatisation-worldwide-failure-lagos-world-bank
Efforts endanger access to and pricing of lifes most precious resource
April 17, 2014 5:00AM ET
by Anna Lappé @annalappe
Opening up the spigot
Independent water advocates, from CAI to Anands group in India and others including the Focus on the Global South network, point to India today as evidence that privatized systems lead to underfunded infrastructure and unpredictable, often high prices. The IFC defends the private sector by claiming that these companies offer efficiency gains (PDF). But those gains come at the expense of lower-income households, advocates such as Naficy point out, as companies increase rates to subsidize their own profitability.
Theres a growing backlash against these projects. In 2000, headlines around the globe documented protests in Bolivias third-largest city in response to the privatization of the citys municipal water supply and against the multinational water giant Bechtel, eventually pushing the company out of the country. The IFCs own complaint mechanism reports that 40 percent of all global cases from last year were about water, even though water projects are only a small fraction of what the IFC funds. In 2013, CAI and 70 advocates from around the globe released an open letter (PDF) to the World Bank Group calling for an end of all support for private water, beginning with IFC divestment from all equity positions in water corporations.
http://america.aljazeera.com/opinions/2014/4/water-managementprivatizationworldbankgroupifc.html
Baobab
(4,667 posts)Privatization is a war against the poor.
Its not the way to survive this century at all.
Read this:
https://www.tni.org/en/article/the-hidden-citizens-revolution-for-public-water
https://www.tni.org/en/blog/overcoming-challenge-right-water-asia
polly7
(20,582 posts)I just read them very quickly and am glad to see so many fighting for what is a human right. I don't know if the poorest of the poor though will be able to take theirs back, there's too much greed and money to be made from controlling it.
Baobab
(4,667 posts)We're all in this together.
I wish I could stop the push to privatize water.
These lines in the 1995 WTO Services Agreement are at the core of the problem - they are the definition of services supplied as an exercise of governmental authority so they define the scope of mandated privatization under countless US-style trade agreements:
(b) 'services' includes any service in any sector except services supplied in the exercise of governmental authority;
(c) 'a service supplied in the exercise of governmental authority' means any service which is supplied neither on a commercial basis, nor in competition with one or more service suppliers."
people need to speak out against that deceptive definition.
Google it and you will see what I mean.
Mojorabbit
(16,020 posts)vkkv
(3,384 posts)chopped down its forests, leveled its hills, muddied its waters, and dirtied its air. That does not fit my definition of a good tenant. If we were here on a month-to-month basis, we would have been evicted long ago. -Rose Bird, Chief Justice of California Supreme Court (2 Nov 1936-1999)