U.S. Split Deepens Over Putin's Intentions In Syria Civil War
Russias latest military moves in Syria have sharpened divisions within the U.S. administration over whether Russian President Vladimir Putin genuinely backs a U.N.-led initiative to end the civil war or is using the negotiations to mask renewed military support for Syrian President Bashar Assad.
Russia has repositioned artillery near the disputed city of Aleppo, several U.S. officials told Reuters. Despite withdrawing some fixed-wing aircraft in March, Russia has also bolstered its forces in Syria with advanced helicopter gunships, and renewed airstrikes against moderate opposition groups, said U.S. officials, speaking on condition of anonymity.
The Russian reassertion of military backing has prompted some U.S. officials to warn that a failure to respond would be seen by Moscow as a fresh sign of American timidity. That, they say, could encourage Russia to escalate challenges to U.S. and allied militaries through more provocative Russian air and naval maneuvers.
They also contend that a U.S. failure to respond would further damage Washingtons relations with Saudi Arabia and other Gulf states seeking to oust Assad, and with Turkey, which has been firing artillery at Islamic State targets in Syria.
The answer, they argue, is stepped-up U.S. support for moderate Syrian rebel factions with more anti-tank missiles and grenade launchers sent through third countries.
However, other officials, including National Security Advisor Susan Rice, have vetoed any significant escalation of U.S. involvement in Syria, the officials said.
Rice is the fly in the ointment, said a person familiar with the internal debate.
more...
http://www.reuters.com/article/us-mideast-crisis-syria-usa-idUSKCN0XJ0DF
David__77
(23,421 posts)Based on what I understand, I think that the US and Russia should both have the same position: have internally-monitored elections in which various parties would be free to participate, including Bashar Assad. Right now, I think that parties are banned under Syrian law that base their membership on race or religion. Personally, that it something I could agree with. I don't understand why the US should support, even indirectly, Islamist insurgents.
BlueMTexpat
(15,369 posts)100 percent!