The best reason for Bernie Sanders to fight on: Hawkish, neoliberal Clintons need a watchful eye
The best reason for Bernie Sanders to fight on: Hawkish, neoliberal Clintons need a watchful eye from progressives
Yes, Sanders needs to play it smart from here. But let's not forget that we need a check on Hillary's deep failings
JIM SLEEPER
If Bernie Sanders loses most of todays primaries in Pennsylvania, Maryland, Connecticut, Delaware and Rhode Island, the wise and the mighty of the Democratic Party and the press will call more loudly than they already have for him to stand down as a candidate and to focus his and his supporters energies instead on helping Hillary Clinton to discredit Donald Trump or any Republican opponent.
Their logic seems compelling, so let me mention and rebut a few of its most convincing points before mentioning the
, ah, elephant in the argument that could embarrass Democrats and actually worsen conditions in the United States even if Clinton wins the White House and the Senate.
The first argument for Bernie to pack it in as a candidate and go all out for Hillary is that we cant afford to underestimate the dangers of Trumps slippery demagoguery and many voters susceptibility to it. To defeat him or any other Republican nominee, Clinton will have to move rightward, not leftward, as she had to do to head off Bernie in the primaries.
This argument doesnt reckon clearly enough with the reality that Democrats would be uniting behind a corporatist, neoliberal grand strategy that Clinton has always supported but whose successes and credibility are nearly exhausted but that she has shown neither the inclination or capacity to change. Breaking glass ceilings and curbing racist and xenophobic policies are absolutely necessary preconditions for American renewal, but theyre also absolutely insufficient. Curbing the national-security mania, the militarist juggernaut, and predatory marketing and lending that have trapped us like flies in a spiders web of 800-numbered, sticky-fingered pick-pocketing machines would require out-strategizing powerful enemies in ways that nothing in Clintons record proves she can or will do.
more: http://www.salon.com/2016/04/26/the_best_reason_for_bernie_sanders_to_fight_on_hawkish_neoliberal_clintons_need_a_watchful_eye_from_progressives/
Buzz Clik
(38,437 posts)ViseGrip
(3,133 posts)Do you think YOU would be running? Do you think the media would make hay of this against you??? Ya think?
That money laundering foundation needs to be put on a watchful eye.
Did Bill return the 'ooopsie' money, 500K from arms he sold through the Foundation WHILE HILLARY WAS AT STATE? A big fucking no no.
Enough. There are no 'watchful eyes'. That's us. How's it working out?
We need better leadership. NO HILLARY!
Trust Buster
(7,299 posts)all due respect. After tonight, I predict the President will publicly acknowledge that Hillary is the presumptive nominee and his staff will start scheduling future campaign appearances for the President. Sanders, on the other hand, has political capital. He can tip his hat to Hillary and use that capital to influence the platform or he can refuse to tip his hat to Hillary and watch his political capital start to evaporate. It's that simple.
Hoppy
(3,595 posts)1. Hillary is better than the wankers from the other party --- no argument there.
2. Hillary is the best choice because her policies are the best for the country and ALL of its people... not just the 1%.
Can you imagine Bernie saying a version of #2? That, my friends, would be his biggest lie ever. And to what end?
Zen Democrat
(5,901 posts)Hillary believes in American troops on the group in the Middle East - Syria to be exact. We'll be entangled in Middle East wars til the end of time. There will be insurrection in the streets of the United States that will dwarf the 60's Vietnam Protests. Hillary is a disaster in the making - a clone of George W. Bush, who calls her his "sister-in-law."
The Republicanization of the Democratic Party is nearly complete, with the help of the media and all establishment institutions. There won't be a DU for long if she prevails. DU will be over and if care isn't taken, the United States will be over.
So why should I vote for Hillary, the war-monger, and the antithesis of everything I have stood for during my 50 years as a Democratic activist. Many Republicans say their party left them. I fear the Democratic Party is leaving me - for the front lines of perpetual war.
BlueMTexpat
(15,369 posts)a watchful eye. http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2016/02/09/bernie-sanders-loves-this-1-trillion-war-machine.html
Even John McCain thinks this is a major boondoggle. http://www.militarytimes.com/story/military/capitol-hill/2016/04/26/john-mccain-f-35-scandal/83546158/