Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
The Classified “28 Pages”: A Diversion from real US-Saudi Issues
by Gareth Porter / April 26th, 2016
The controversy surrounding the infamous 28 pages on the possible Saudi connection with the terrorists that were excised from the joint Congressional report on the 9/11 attacks is at fever pitch. But that controversy is a distraction from the real problems that Saudi Arabias policies pose to the United States and the entire Middle East region.
The Saudi regime certainly played a role in the trail of events that led to 9/11, but there is no need to wait for the declassification of the 28 pages to understand that trail. It has long been well documented that the socio-political constituency for bin Ladens anti-US organisation in the kingdom was so large and influential that the government itself was forced to tread with extreme caution on al-Qaeda until the groups attacks on the Saudi regime began in 2003.
The Clinton administration had learned that Saudi supporters of bin Laden were being allowed to finance his operations through Saudi charities. The regime systematically denied CIA requests for bin Ladens birth certificate, passport and banks records. 9/11 Commission investigators learned, moreover, that after bin Ladens move from Sudan to Afghanistan in May 1996, a delegation of Saudi officials had asked top Taliban leaders to tell bin Laden that if he didnt attack the regime, the 1994 termination of his Saudi citizenship and freezing of his assets would be rescinded.
The US government has known that Saudi financing of madrassas all over the world has been a major source of jihadist activism. The Saudi regimes extremist Wahhabi perspective on Shia Islam is the basis for its paranoid stance on the rest of the region and the destabilisation of Syria and Yemen. The 28 pages should be released, but at a time when the contradictions between US and Saudi interests are finally beginning to be openly acknowledged, the issue is just another diversion from the real debate on Saudi Arabia that is urgently needed.
The Clinton administration had learned that Saudi supporters of bin Laden were being allowed to finance his operations through Saudi charities. The regime systematically denied CIA requests for bin Ladens birth certificate, passport and banks records. 9/11 Commission investigators learned, moreover, that after bin Ladens move from Sudan to Afghanistan in May 1996, a delegation of Saudi officials had asked top Taliban leaders to tell bin Laden that if he didnt attack the regime, the 1994 termination of his Saudi citizenship and freezing of his assets would be rescinded.
The US government has known that Saudi financing of madrassas all over the world has been a major source of jihadist activism. The Saudi regimes extremist Wahhabi perspective on Shia Islam is the basis for its paranoid stance on the rest of the region and the destabilisation of Syria and Yemen. The 28 pages should be released, but at a time when the contradictions between US and Saudi interests are finally beginning to be openly acknowledged, the issue is just another diversion from the real debate on Saudi Arabia that is urgently needed.
First published in Middle East Eye
Full article: http://dissidentvoice.org/2016/04/the-classified-28-pages-a-diversion-from-real-us-saudi-issues/
Gareth Porter, an investigative historian and journalist specialising in U.S. national security policy, received the UK-based Gellhorn Prize for journalism for 2011 for articles on the U.S. war in Afghanistan. His Manufactured Crisis: The Untold Story of the Iran Nuclear Scare was published in 2014. Read other articles by Gareth.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
5 replies, 1324 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (7)
ReplyReply to this post
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Classified “28 Pages”: A Diversion from real US-Saudi Issues (Original Post)
polly7
Apr 2016
OP
yurbud
(39,405 posts)1. We were attacked by a close ally, and the conduit of funds to hijackers was Bush family friend...
This might be being used as a distraction, but since 3,000 Americans died, it's worth looking at why the Bush administration and others in the know about the Saudi role didn't demand that they be punished.
polly7
(20,582 posts)2. You're right, yurbud. I completely agree with that.
I just thought it was a good article wrt SA's actions in the ME and their duplicity in funding terror against even allies. But absolutely, the answers you seek are the most important and I would feel the same.
bobthedrummer
(26,083 posts)3. K&R I remember what James Baker et al has done. n/t
KoKo
(84,711 posts)4. Recommend for Exposure!
Thanks "Polly 7."
nilram
(2,888 posts)5. BUT "at a time when the contradictions between US and Saudi interests...
are finally beginning to be openly acknowledged"
Right. The report was released in 2004 and it's now 2016 and I should just sit on my blessed hands some more. Ok, sure, I'll do that.
Ow. Ow! OWWW! OWWWWW!!! I was rolling my eyes so hard I think I sprained them! OWWWW!!!