of parole I would agree

I know it is not a favorable viewpoint here, but this is the one issue I guess my tendencies veer towards the conservative. Oh, and I'm also very anti-gun.

I think there are crimes which deserve the death penalty. Ultimately it should be the victims' families who have a say in the matter, and unless every family of his 9 victims feels he should live, he should be tried with the death penalty on the table.

The fact he is not a threat is irrelevant. Although, it actually is meaningful in some ways. Dylann is not getting out of jail again, so what real use is there left for him on this planet? So he can be rehabilitated? For what purpose? Will he ever need to use that rehabilitation when he gets out into society? No.

I can see the point that he will suffer much more by living out his years in a jail cell, but so far as I'm concerned, he is taking taxpayers' money for his care over potentially the next 70 years, and he is also using the limited resources of this planet, and that imo is a waste.

While I can see many cases where the death penalty might be unjustified, this is not one of them. The religious inspired belief by the families is admirable, but it is a reflection of their religious beliefs, rather than what should be justified in this particular case.

It sickens me that I have to share this planet with a scumbag like him. After how they welcomed him in, they showed what kind of people they were, and the fact they're now dead is tragic, and he should pay in a like manner by giving up his miserable life.