Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Republicans keep trying to normalize Trump. He keeps proving it’s impossible.
DAMAGING AS Donald Trumps style is to American political culture, thats not where the focus should be after this astonishing weekend. True, the campaign fumbled the rollout of Mr. Trumps vice-presidential pick and failed even more miserably in its efforts at style adjustment. But those missteps should not distract from the more basic failure of substance. The candidate does not deal honestly with issues neither in the sense of basic logic and fact nor in the sense of offering voters something more than slogans upon which to evaluate his potential presidency.
As Republicans assembled in Cleveland, the Trump campaign was trying to normalize the candidate. The choice of the relatively conventional governor of Indiana, Mike Pence, as running mate, was part of the effort, as was the sheaf of boilerplate that Mr. Trump sporadically consulted during his introduction of Mr. Pence on Saturday. But in repeated flights of rhetoric, both Saturday and in a joint interview with Mr. Pence on Sundays edition of 60 Minutes, Mr. Trump showed that belligerent self-absorption is not, for him, just an act; its characterological. You might say this bull carries the china shop around with him.
That is less alarming than Mr. Trumps continuing inclination to fiction. He wildly accused his likely opponent, Democrat Hillary Clinton, of having created or invented the Islamic State terrorist group. He blamed her for having led President Obama into all of his policy mistakes, when in fact it is well-documented that she pushed for a different, more muscular approach to Syrias civil war. He insisted that the Obama approach to the Islamic State is weak, and that his would be far stronger, then, in response to prodding from CBSs Lesley Stahl, outlined an approach selective use of U.S. ground troops, reliance on regional allies hardly distinguishable from current policy. To be sure, a Trump administration would declare war on the Islamic State, presumably with a vote of Congress; that, indeed, might fill the legal lacuna in which the United States now operates. We wonder, though, whether Mr. Trump understands that a declaration of war reaffirms the applicability of the laws of war, which would preclude his plan for worse than waterboarding.
As Republicans assembled in Cleveland, the Trump campaign was trying to normalize the candidate. The choice of the relatively conventional governor of Indiana, Mike Pence, as running mate, was part of the effort, as was the sheaf of boilerplate that Mr. Trump sporadically consulted during his introduction of Mr. Pence on Saturday. But in repeated flights of rhetoric, both Saturday and in a joint interview with Mr. Pence on Sundays edition of 60 Minutes, Mr. Trump showed that belligerent self-absorption is not, for him, just an act; its characterological. You might say this bull carries the china shop around with him.
That is less alarming than Mr. Trumps continuing inclination to fiction. He wildly accused his likely opponent, Democrat Hillary Clinton, of having created or invented the Islamic State terrorist group. He blamed her for having led President Obama into all of his policy mistakes, when in fact it is well-documented that she pushed for a different, more muscular approach to Syrias civil war. He insisted that the Obama approach to the Islamic State is weak, and that his would be far stronger, then, in response to prodding from CBSs Lesley Stahl, outlined an approach selective use of U.S. ground troops, reliance on regional allies hardly distinguishable from current policy. To be sure, a Trump administration would declare war on the Islamic State, presumably with a vote of Congress; that, indeed, might fill the legal lacuna in which the United States now operates. We wonder, though, whether Mr. Trump understands that a declaration of war reaffirms the applicability of the laws of war, which would preclude his plan for worse than waterboarding.
More from the washington Post editorial board at:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/republicans-keep-trying-to-normalize-trump-he-keeps-proving-its-impossible/2016/07/18/7e6cad68-4ced-11e6-aa14-e0c1087f7583_story.html
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 1232 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (4)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Republicans keep trying to normalize Trump. He keeps proving it’s impossible. (Original Post)
FSogol
Jul 2016
OP
He said: "there is something going on" in regards to the shooting in Baton Rouge.
applegrove
Jul 2016
#1
applegrove
(118,758 posts)1. He said: "there is something going on" in regards to the shooting in Baton Rouge.
He's such a creep. Activating people's conspiracies and fears.
ThoughtCriminal
(14,047 posts)2. Juest what does the GOP consider "Normal" these days?
Let's ask Rep. Steve King (R-Batshitistan).