Georgia Court Says It's Legal to Film Video Up a Woman's Skirt
Georgia Court Says It's Legal to Film Video Up a Woman's Skirt
Justice is blindunless it's looking up your skirt.
Madison Pauly
Jul. 25, 2016 6:05 PM
In a win for folks who believe women's bodies are public property, the Georgia Court of Appeals ruled in favor of a supermarket employee who followed a customer around the store, secretly recording a video of the view up her skirt. Citing a "gap" in Georgia's criminal statutes, Judge Elizabeth Branch and five colleagues ruled earlier this month that "upskirting" is permissible under current law.
"It is regrettable that no law currently exists which criminalizes (the appellants) reprehensible conduct," Branch wrote.
Security footage from a Publix store in Houston County, Georgia, shows employee Brandon Lee Gary stooping down behind a woman and aiming his cellphone camera underneath her skirt as she picked an item from the supermarket shelves. Then he did it at least three more times. Upset after catching him on the floor behind her repeatedly, the woman left the store. She later returned to complain to the store's manager, according to the Atlanta Journal-Constitution. Gary later admitted to police officers that he was responsible for the video recordings.
Following the June 2013 incident, a local judge convicted Gary of criminal invasion of privacy, deciding that "there's no more blatant invasion of privacy than to do what (Gary) did," according to the appeals court ruling. But in Gary's appeal, the court examined whether his conduct was actually criminal under the state's invasion-of-privacy law. The statute forbids "any person, through the use of any device, without the consent of all persons observed, to observe, photograph, or record the activities of another which occur in any private place and out of public view."
More:
http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2016/07/judges-view-your-skirt-public-space-ladies
[center]
Brandon Lee Gary
MrScorpio
(73,631 posts)Another case where women's bodies are not under their own control.
I bet that if these women had demanded to get paid to be up skirted, someone would be hell bent on arresting them on a "solicitation" or "public indecency" charge or some such bullshit.
Putting a woman in the White House is just the bare minimum.
Travis_0004
(5,417 posts)Only that as of today there is no law on the books maling it illegal. Obviously the correct response it to pass a law to make it illegal, which I hope will happen.
David__77
(23,420 posts)The law can be changed.
COLGATE4
(14,732 posts)Not a good idea IMO.
David__77
(23,420 posts)I don't agree with that one.
anoNY42
(670 posts)that the court is not saying this is a good thing. The court is doing its job and stating whether the law prohibits this conduct, and the answer, according to this court, under Georgia law, is "no".
Obviously, GA must now amend its criminal laws to correct this.
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)If a statute is poorly worded, not the court's fault.
4lbs
(6,858 posts)of many male perverts.
Women in Georgia might have to avoid wearing skirts or even low-cut tops for a while, or go out with a friend who can literally watch their back.