Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
The 1965 Law That Gave the Republican Party Its Race Problem
LBJ didnt think the Immigration and Nationality Act would be revolutionary. He was wrong.By Josh Zeitz
August 20, 2016
During the long, three-year debate over the immigration act of 1965, members of Congress debated the wisdom and morality of removing 1920s-era quotas on immigration to the United States. Not far from the center of this debate was the nettlesome issue of race.
The people of Ethiopia have the same right to come to the United States under this bill as the people from England, the people of France, the people of Germany, [and] the people of Holland, griped Senator Sam Ervin, a conservative Democrat from North Carolina. With all due respect to Ethiopia, I dont know of any contributions that Ethiopia has made to the making of America.
President Lyndon Johnson, hoping to tamp down concerns about the immigration act at a time when Congress was engaged in an even more ferocious debate over the voting rights act, sought to downplay the implications of the proposed immigration law: This bill that we will sign today is not a revolutionary bill, he said upon signing it. The president, like many other of the laws supporters, sincerely believed that Europeans were most likely to take advantage of less stringent U.S. immigration policy.
He was wrong.
The Hart-Celler Act, so-called after its co-sponsors New York Congressman Emanuel Celler and Michican Senator Philip Hart, opened the floodgates to new immigrants when it went into effect in 1968. But the vast majority of them didnt come from Europe; they came instead from Latin America, Africa and Asia. In 1965, non-Hispanic whites comprised over 85 percent of the American population. Fifty years later, that portion is just 62 percent, and falling.
Read more: http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2016/08/immigration-1965-law-donald-trump-gop-214179#ixzz4HtKzZp2x
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 1494 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (6)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The 1965 Law That Gave the Republican Party Its Race Problem (Original Post)
DonViejo
Aug 2016
OP
Dawson Leery
(19,348 posts)1. k/r
The right wing hates this law. Trace Adkkkins openly hates the law. He faults it for "changing the character of the nation".
True Dough
(17,304 posts)2. And think of how the economy has ebbed and flowed many times since 1965
The economy runs in cycles. When it is surging, as it did under Bill Clinton, there is much less focus on "those people" (immigrants) who are supposedly hurting the economy.
But when times are leaner, it's a prime opportunity for a figure like Donald Trump to rise to prominence with his divisive rhetoric. People want a scapegoat and the people with darker skin, or thick foreign accents or who dress differently (like wearing a niqab) are easy targets.