Trump as Russian oligarch
Columnist Anne Applebaum in today's WaPo:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/the-secret-to-trump-hes-really-a-russian-oligarch/2016/08/19/bc7226a2-6623-11e6-be4e-23fc4d4d12b4_story.html?utm_term=.37e0bf082808
During the course of a long career, Paul Manafort, the ousted boss of the Donald Trump campaign, has helped oligarchs and crooks of all kinds come to power. He worked for Ferdinand Marcos and Jonas Savimbi; in Ukraine, he helped transform an ex-convict, Viktor Yanukovych, into a corrupt president who fired on demonstrators and eventually fled the country. Given all of that, recent reports that Yanukovychs party allotted Manafort $12 million in off-the-books cash should hardly have come as a surprise.
Now hes been pushed aside by the differently sinister figure of Stephen Bannon. But before Manafort fades from view, its worth looking at what his affiliation with Trump tells us about both of them. Quite a lot has already been written, including by me, on the multiple connections between Vladimir Putins Russia and the Trump campaign. But the deeper point has not really been driven home: The real problem with Trump isnt that he is sympathetic to Russian oligarchs, its that he is a Russian oligarch, albeit one who happens to be American. By this, I dont mean that Trump eats caviar or hangs out in Moscow nightclubs, although for all I know hes done both of those things. He is, rather, an oligarch in the Russian style a rich man who aspires to combine business with politics and has an entirely cynical and instrumental attitude toward both. The Kremlin actively seeks to buy politicians all across Europe. Trump, meanwhile, has explained that he gave money in the past to candidates from both political parties the majority Democrats because I support politicians .?.?. and that was because of the fact that I am in business. He has never shown any interest in real policy debates or political ideas, just in whom and what he could buy.
His transition from donor to candidate, although partly motivated by megalomania, has also been designed to shore up his businesses. Just as Russian businessmen use political power to direct money to their own companies, so does Trump. Federal records in June showed that a fifth of his campaign spending was being directed toward his own businesses, ensuring that he makes a profit whatever happens. He has used campaign events to promote Trump products and a campaign visit to Scotland to promote a Trump golf course. Now those around him are hinting that even if he loses, he can turn his mob of angry followers into the foundation of a media company.
. . .
In modern history. . .we have never had a president who used the power and influence of the federal government to enrich himself while serving. But if Trump wins, that may be what we get. He isnt running a campaign designed to help his party or his country, or even to push a coherent set of ideas. Hes running a campaign for the same reasons a Russian oligarch would: to build a brand, to stoke an ego, to make money. Its the kind of campaign that succeeds in failing states and autocracies. If he wins, America could become one too.