What James Comey Did
http://www.nybooks.com/articles/2016/12/08/what-james-comey-did/David Cole
Whatever else one might say about the just-concluded 2016 presidential election, one thing is certain: FBI Director James Comey played an outsized and exceptionally inappropriate part. His highly prejudicial announcement on October 28, just eleven days before the election, that he had reopened an investigation into Hillary Clintons private e-mail server ensured that the final critical days of the campaign were taken up with innuendos and suppositions set off by his action.
When Comey then announced on November 5, just two days before the election, that upon further review he had again found no basis to believe that Clinton had committed any crime, it only underscored the impropriety of his October 28 announcement. Had he conducted the review in confidence, as Justice Department rules require, the entire matter would have been resolved without interfering with the election. As it was, his October 28 announcement dramatically shifted the trajectory of the campaign, deflected attention from Donald Trumps own considerable troubles, and inevitably influenced the choices of many early voters.
Comey made the renewed investigation public against Justice Department policy and rules, and over the objections of the attorney general and several other Justice Department officials, even though he had not even seen the new evidence, much less determined that it hinted at any wrongdoing on Clintons part. The announcement predictably played right into the hands of Trump, who immediately took the occasion to repeat his charge that Clinton should be locked up. None of this should have happened; under long-standing Justice Department practice, Comey should have kept silent about the fact of further investigation, especially so close to an election.
Whether Comeys imprudent intervention changed the outcome of the presidential election, the damage to the integrity of both the political and criminal processes has been done. The criminal process has been politicized, and the political process has been tainted by misuse of official power. The question that remains is what should happen now. At a minimum, the Justice Department policies that Comey violated must be strengthened and formalized to ensure that this never happens again.
. . . more
WhiteTara
(29,718 posts)the horror of what is to come.
red dog 1
(27,816 posts)pnwmom
(108,978 posts)into the end of the election, and Hillary never had time to recover from it.
lapucelle
(18,265 posts)on the "Hillary lost because..." thread.
Several of them showed up at once, probably because a circle jerk is so much more fun than solitary masturbation.
One of them made the mistake of making the peculiar assertion that "even regular Democrats" didn't like Hillary.
What the hell is a regular Democrat?
lastone
(588 posts)I don't understand. Besides a "we got this" attitude by the Clinton camp Comey swayed the election, time to hold him accountable for breaking his own damn rules! Don't turn the other cheek to look to the fucking future, prosecute that lying little fuck as hard as possible.
Chakab
(1,727 posts)the Trump administration?
(Good God, I just typed the words "Trump administration." This is a fucking nightmare.)
I never understood why Obama felt it necessary to "reach across the aisle" and appoint a Republican. The same goes with the Chuck Hagel appointment.
Response to Chakab (Reply #4)
Grey Lemercier This message was self-deleted by its author.
pangaia
(24,324 posts)I almost vomited when I saw that..
The president's obsessive need for "bipartisanship" and having to seem like the adult in the room so that David Brooks will write nice things about him, or whatever other ridiculous motivation he has is to blame for what happened. If Comey were not the head of the FBI so that the President could have been praised (by nobody) for "reaching across the aisle", then likely this never would have happened.
joshcryer
(62,276 posts)As his legacy is eroded (it won't be fully destroyed) he'll look back on that fact that they were obstructed in every way.
The man never had a budget passed beyond his first one, it was all continuing resolutions.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)We know now, of course, that it was not based on actual integrity. The man's profoundly corrupt.
joshcryer
(62,276 posts)You don't get to the top without having a "good reputation." But it's a mile wide and an inch deep, as we see over and over again.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)don't reach those levels by running nursery schools, but neither do the positions exclude people of sufficient honor and wisdom to serve their country properly.
ZERO acceptance for comeyism.
joshcryer
(62,276 posts)And it hurts my soul.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)facade for weakness and an acceptance that amounts to personal corruption, which it is far too often. With over 300 million people in this nation, there are many good ones to choose from. We could say a big no and "enjoy prison" to the Comeys if only a few more million decided to hold to some basic standards.
Kathy M
(1,242 posts)red dog 1
(27,816 posts)Why DIDN'T Obama do something about Comey as soon as the rat bastard sent that letter to Congress?
I'm no lawyer, but Comey's Anti-Clinton actions 10 days before the election seem to me to be a clear violation of the 1939 Hatch Act.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hatch_Act_of_1939
DK504
(3,847 posts)Why didn't the AG go after Comey for the violation of the Hatch Act? Why didn't Prez. Obama fire Comey on the spot? How was this allowed to even be a thing without the AG's say so, she is his boss after all.
Corey's actions alone influenced the election to Trump, no doubt about it. How is it absolutely NOTHING has happened to him?
red dog 1
(27,816 posts)lark
(23,102 posts)violating the Hatch Act. It's especially egregious when he told Congress there were no ties between drumpf and russia and that too was a total lie. He needs to go down so repugs see there are consequences. They think they can steal the election like in 2000 and face no repercussions.
world wide wally
(21,744 posts)WestSeattle2
(1,730 posts)decades for Americans to view the FBI as an independent investigative agency. Comey trashed all of that with a five minute news conference. It was an absolutely foolish and incomprehensible action, for which he should be ashamed.
Kathy M
(1,242 posts)In the end election favored Clinton but a few days prior
"Some of you may have heard about a letter that the FBI director sent out yesterday," she said. "Its pretty strange to put something like that out with so little information right before an election. In fact its not just strange -- its unprecedented, and it is deeply troubling." (See her remarks here at around 3:30.)
But is it? Theres one prior example that has at least some similarities -- the announcement of an indictment against Caspar Weinberger, the former defense secretary under President Ronald Reagan, just four days before the 1992 election, when Reagans vice president, George H.W. Bush, was running for a second term in the White House. "
Oh , the indictment was later dropped ..........
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/2016/nov/01/was-james-comeys-letter-unprecedented-hillary-clin/
There are many articles if one wants to google Clinton , Bush , 1992 Weinberger
I voted Perot that election .........
Think it may be time for the Democratic party know and work on what kind of party it wants to be . Time may be better spent there instead of fixating on excuses .
kebob
(499 posts)red dog 1
(27,816 posts)keithbvadu2
(36,816 posts)red dog 1
(27,816 posts)"The FBI is Trumpland: Anti-Clinton Atmosphere Spurred Leaking, Sources say"
http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/nov/03/fbi-leaks-hillary-clinton-james-comey-donald-trump
world wide wally
(21,744 posts)platform to respond personally to the American people?
Coincidence?
Doubtful.
Little Star
(17,055 posts)red dog 1
(27,816 posts)President Obama should have done his job and immediately place Comey on un-paid leave, pending DOJ seeking an indictment against Comey for violation of the hatch Act of 1939.
The obvious other question is why the hell he appointed Comey as FBI Director in the first place.
(The Republican Party is the insane asylum of the United States, imo)
Little Star
(17,055 posts)he's going to have to live with the shame of that appointment & lack of placing Comey on un-paid leave, pending DOJ seeking an indictment against Comey for violation of the hatch Act. Huge misstep on his part.
red dog 1
(27,816 posts)However, although I, "used to love" Obama, I sure don't love him now, and I'm not too crazy about Hillary anymore either.
She should have called for election audits in all the key states, including Florida, on the day after the election.
We got robbed!
They stole yet another election!
Historic NY
(37,449 posts)apcalc
(4,465 posts)Probably the worst appointment Obama ever offered.
red dog 1
(27,816 posts)K&R, by the way.
Wash. state Desk Jet
(3,426 posts)Small margin ,all that. I think it was more about what it looks like is what counts,not what it really is. A place to point,because of this,that happened. When she conceded she did say, someday a woman will be president of the United States,maybe sooner than they think.
Just maybe sooner not later because of what it really is.
It all reminded me of something very carefully staged.
Little Star
(17,055 posts)Zambero
(8,964 posts)Might as well change the FBI's DC Hoover building HQ name to Comey's Collusion Club. Equal "kudos" to the KGB. There's no telling what can be accomplished when committed team players work tireless (and shamelessly) toward the same goal.