All the Tools to Suppress Dissent and Kill Free Speech Are Already In Place
(*Mods - headline had to be shortened, it wouldn't all fit.)
November 27, 2016
In the wrong (read: small) hands, the post-9/11 surveillance apparatus can be a dangerous political weapon
When Donald Trump takes office in January, he will inherit a surveillance state that George W. Bush largely created and that President Obama refused to rein in. As has been explained before, privacy is vital to a democracy, and the fate of free speech and the free press are in the hands of a thin-skinned bully who doesnt seem to care for them.
Surveillance powers have a history of abuse in totalitarian societies, Neil Richards, a law professor at Washington University in St. Louis, told Salon. They also have a long history of abuse in the United States, from wiretapping to new forms of digital surveillance.
Richards also explained that American agencies have created files on dissidents and used their power to disrupt political expression.
The most extreme case is that of the FBIs surveillance of Martin Luther King, in which it used evidence of an extra-marital affair he was having to attempt to convince him to kill himself, Richards said. Put simply, widespread unconstrained government surveillance has a huge potential for abuse and can be deeply corrosive of democratic culture, free speech, and other civil liberties.
...
http://www.alternet.org/election-2016/donald-trumps-surveillance-state-all-tools-suppress-dissent-and-kill-free-speech-are