Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Green Party candidate Jill Stein says she's not to blame for Trump's fluke victory, Democrats...
Green Party candidate Jill Stein says shes not to blame for Trumps fluke victory, Democrats still doomedFiery Green nominee makes a coherent case about the many failures of American democracy. But she's not the answer
ANDREW O'HEHIR
Jill Stein really, really wants you to know that shes not responsible for President Donald Trump. I had a chance to put that case to the Green Partys 2016 presidential nominee when she visited Salons New York office on Friday, and she was more than ready for the accusation. Stein has a point at least up to a point.
Her comeback is sensible enough: The math doesnt work. To make the case that Stein played a definitive spoiler role in the 2016 presidential election, you have to assume that nearly all her voters (or at least nearly all of them in the key Midwestern states won by Trump) would have yanked the lever for Hillary Clinton if Stein hadnt been on the ballot. No one can prove or disprove what might have happened in an alternate universe, but Stein is correct to say that isnt a coherent or logical assumption. She says that polls of Green voters suggest that most of them would simply have stayed home, some would have voted for Trump or Libertarian nominee Gary Johnson, and fewer than one in three would have voted for Clinton. That almost certainly would not have been enough to alter the outcome.
So I concur that its not fair to point the finger at Stein and the Greens and say You ruined everything! Shes right to observe that the number of Democrats who didnt bother to show up at all, or who crossed party lines to vote for Trump, vastly exceeds the number of potential Clinton voters who went Green instead. Shes also right that the Democratic Partys default position after every electoral setback is to blame renegade leftists on the margins rather than confronting the consequences of several decades worth of rootless, rudderless ideological drift. To consider the Ralph Nader factor in isolation as if it had no political causes and no historical context, and as if it could have been wished away was not entirely fair in 2000 (when the case for it was a lot stronger), and is even less so in 2016.
But even the fact that Steins vote total was too small to make much difference, and that the Democrats major institutional and ideological problems lie elsewhere, speaks to the fundamental weakness of her position. On one hand, the Green Partys optics are terrible, as we say these days. Theres no way around the fact that Steins modest vote totals in each of the three fateful states that put Trump over the top Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin exceeded the razor-thin margins between Trump and Clinton.
more + 3 min video of interview
http://www.salon.com/2016/12/02/jill-stein-spoiled-the-2016-election-for-hillary-clinton/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
8 replies, 1536 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (1)
ReplyReply to this post
8 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Green Party candidate Jill Stein says she's not to blame for Trump's fluke victory, Democrats... (Original Post)
DonViejo
Feb 2017
OP
Why doesn't the Green Party start with school boards and state legislators if they actually
world wide wally
Feb 2017
#7
wcmagumba
(2,886 posts)1. Jillenstein...
kindly please gfy!
bravenak
(34,648 posts)2. She is crazy and needs to go home and stop ruining our lives
Blah blah blah, jill is a bad singer and a worse politician
Uponthegears
(1,499 posts)3. IMHO, the problem with Jill Stein
and the Green Party in general, isn't that they cost Hillary the election (which I agree they did not), but that they aren't really "leftists" at all, past a slogan or two.
The Greens in Europe actually stand for a set of principles and are a real force. They aren't saying "we can't win, therefore you shouldn't participate." They're winning.
Here, they are just a fraud.
dalton99a
(81,526 posts)8. They certainly were Putin's useful idiots in the election.
Paladin
(28,265 posts)4. You sure as hell didn't help matters, lady.
Collect your Ralph Nader Democratic Spoiler certificate, and disappear......
Gothmog
(145,330 posts)5. Denial is not just a river in Africa
Stein is an idiot if she believes her editorial
BlueMTexpat
(15,370 posts)6. F*ck Jill Stein!
And anyone who voted for her.
world wide wally
(21,744 posts)7. Why doesn't the Green Party start with school boards and state legislators if they actually
want to be a viable political party?
Just straight to POTUS?