Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

bananas

(27,509 posts)
Tue Mar 6, 2012, 09:30 AM Mar 2012

The (Nuclear) Winter Of Our Discontent

http://news.opb.org/article/the_nuclear_winter_of_our_discontent/

The (Nuclear) Winter Of Our Discontent

Climate Central | March 6, 2012 4:33 a.m.

The specter of a nuclear conflagration looms in the tinderbox that is the Middle East and South Asia. While heads of state and military leaders game out every possible result, including the nightmarish worst-case scenarios, it's worth also contemplating the collateral ramifications of a nuclear conflict, including its potentially dramatic effects on the climate.

Those ramifications, after all, would affect all of us, perhaps irrevocably.

If a nuclear war were to break out in the Middle East or South Asia (or anywhere else, for that matter), the least of our short-term worries would be climate change. But, depending on the size and number of weapons used, as well as the specific targets hit, a nuclear conflict could seriously impact the global climate system, ushering in a period of dramatic global cooling.

Even limited regional nuclear exchanges — which are more likely now that the number of nuclear weapons states has increased — would have major implications for the climate system that would be similar to, although not as severe as, the “nuclear winter” scenarios popularized during the Cold War, according to the most recent studies.

In fact, modern climate simulations show that the climate system may be even more sensitive to a nuclear conflict than previously thought.

<snip>
1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The (Nuclear) Winter Of Our Discontent (Original Post) bananas Mar 2012 OP
Interesting. While I firmly believe that a traditional, full-scale WW3 is all but impossible....... AverageJoe90 Mar 2012 #1
 

AverageJoe90

(10,745 posts)
1. Interesting. While I firmly believe that a traditional, full-scale WW3 is all but impossible.......
Wed Mar 7, 2012, 02:19 AM
Mar 2012

...in this day and age, not only to due the much greater amount of globalization but also thanks to the end of the Cold War in 1991 amongst other factors, I can honestly say that a limited atomic exchange would be nothing to scoff at. Around, say, ~500 mt worth of weapons probably wouldn't produce more than perhaps a couple of months' worth of fallout but if it were to occur at a certain time, say, mid-spring to late summer, then there could be a bit of problem on our hands here food wise, as some crops could be badly damaged and maybe even killed by sudden noticeable drops in temperature, and not to mention the HORRIBLE short and long-term environmental damage that would occur in whichever localized region this attack was to occur, as well as the world's economy;
Even only a small exchange between India and China, for example could seriously harm it simply due to the fact that both countries do supply much of the world's trade, particularly the latter.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»The (Nuclear) Winter Of O...