Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

sharedvalues

(6,916 posts)
Sun Jun 4, 2017, 12:34 AM Jun 2017

WaPo investigation: partisan nonprofits enabled Trump, using rich people's tax-deductible donations

https://www.washingtonpost.com/investigations/how-a-shadow-universe-of-charities-joined-with-political-warriors-to-fuel-trumps-rise/2017/06/03/ff5626ac-3a77-11e7-a058-ddbb23c75d82_story.html

From the start, Horowitz was supported by contributions from stalwart conservative groups, including the John M. Olin Foundation and the Lynde and Harry Bradley Foundation, along with donations from the wealthy Scaife family of Pittsburgh.

Horowitz’s charity launched a group called Students for Academic Freedom, framing it as a counterweight to the dominance of the left in high schools and on college campuses. Miller formed a chapter and sought permission from school officials to invite Horowitz to the school to speak. When administrators delayed, Miller and Horowitz accused them of stifling free speech.

By 2006, Horowitz’s charity, now operating as the David Horowitz Freedom Center, was staging events, publishing books and pamphlets, and operating a website devoted to “news on the war at home and abroad” against the left.

The Freedom Center was among a growing group of allied charities that received funding from large, conservative foundations such as Donors Capital Fund, Donors Trust, the Bradley Foundation and the Scaife family. For decades, those foundations and others had financed nonprofit organizations that promoted free enterprise and small government and opposed the environmental movement and other issues favored by progressives.

In general, charities have been able to operate with little scrutiny by regulators. The number of enforcement officials at the IRS and the audits they conduct have dwindled over the past decade. The IRS became especially reluctant to enforce limitations on political activity, following a furious backlash from conservatives and Republicans in Congress in 2013 over allegations the agency was illegally targeting tea party groups seeking tax-exempt status. An IRS spokesman declined to comment.

Cleta Mitchell, a lawyer, Bradley Foundation board member and recipient of a Freedom Center award, said conservative charities “take great pains to stay within their lanes from a legal perspective.”

Matthew Vadum, senior vice president of the tax-exempt Capital Research Center and a prolific contributor to the Freedom Center’s Frontpagemag.com, said there is no question the conservative charities work in concert.


----

ed note: Bradley, Olin, Scaife, Koch, Walton have together done a lot of harm to American society.
6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
WaPo investigation: partisan nonprofits enabled Trump, using rich people's tax-deductible donations (Original Post) sharedvalues Jun 2017 OP
It's about time David Horowitz got exposed. dalton99a Jun 2017 #1
O'Donnell exposed 504Cs that were political-illegal but... snowy owl Jun 2017 #2
No ideological group should be a non-profit sharedvalues Jun 2017 #3
O'Donnell exposed the exact wording and still it goes on. Our #1 demand on politicians: Obey the law snowy owl Jun 2017 #4
O'Donnell excellent on this: Make the IRS revert to the original definition for "social welfare" stuffmatters Jun 2017 #6
i.e. that we, American taxpayers, are forced to subsidize all these scum. stuffmatters Jun 2017 #5

snowy owl

(2,145 posts)
2. O'Donnell exposed 504Cs that were political-illegal but...
Sun Jun 4, 2017, 04:12 PM
Jun 2017

Congress let them continue. I can't remember the whole wording but it was clear they were to be non- political. I can't deduct my political donations. Another result of an unaccountable congress and legal system.

sharedvalues

(6,916 posts)
3. No ideological group should be a non-profit
Sun Jun 4, 2017, 08:51 PM
Jun 2017

It is beyond ridiculous that donations to Cato and Heritage and Bradley are tax-deductible.

stuffmatters

(2,574 posts)
6. O'Donnell excellent on this: Make the IRS revert to the original definition for "social welfare"
Mon Jun 5, 2017, 06:37 AM
Jun 2017

The IRs changed the definition all by themselves in the Eisenhower Administration. To qualify for this tax exemption/privacy right a
charity had to exist "solely" for social welfare; it was changed from "solely" to "primarily" which ultimately opened the political slush gates.
Obama's IRS could have changed it back by just putting the original word back, but, of course, that's why the RW billionaires fought so hard ag the IRS screaming it was making "political" decisions. Obama didn't do it, Trump obviously never would...so here we are.

stuffmatters

(2,574 posts)
5. i.e. that we, American taxpayers, are forced to subsidize all these scum.
Mon Jun 5, 2017, 06:28 AM
Jun 2017

I've always thought that was the ultimate thrill for the Koch & their aligned billionaire creeps... forcing us, the taxpaying rabble in their eyes, through the tax code to pay to spread their lies, support their bull shit ideologies and institutions and candidates. It's hundreds of billions of dollars not only tax free but also donor/dark money i.d. protected in this "social welfare" exemption they all exploit.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»WaPo investigation: parti...