Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

struggle4progress

(118,295 posts)
Tue Jun 6, 2017, 10:54 AM Jun 2017

The Myth of the Kindly General Lee

ADAM SERWER
JUN 4, 2017

... The myth of Lee goes something like this: He was a brilliant strategist and devoted Christian man who abhorred slavery and labored tirelessly after the war to bring the country back together.

There is little truth in this ...

Lee’s cruelty as a slavemaster was not confined to physical punishment. In Reading the Man, the historian Elizabeth Brown Pryor’s portrait of Lee through his writings, Pryor writes that “Lee ruptured the Washington and Custis tradition of respecting slave families,” by hiring them off to other plantations, and that “by 1860 he had broken up every family but one on the estate, some of whom had been together since Mount Vernon days.” The separation of slave families was one of the most unfathomably devastating aspects of slavery, and Pryor wrote that Lee’s slaves regarded him as “the worst man I ever see” ...

During his invasion of Pennsylvania, Lee’s Army of Northern Virginia enslaved free blacks and brought them back to the South as property. Pryor writes that “evidence links virtually every infantry and cavalry unit in Lee’s army” with the abduction of free black Americans, “with the activity under the supervision of senior officers” ...


https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2017/06/the-myth-of-the-kindly-general-lee/529038/




5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Myth of the Kindly General Lee (Original Post) struggle4progress Jun 2017 OP
this needs to be widely disseminated.... dhill926 Jun 2017 #1
Marking for later read underpants Jun 2017 #2
Keep this thread going, PoindexterOglethorpe Jun 2017 #3
Reckless General/Poor Planner modrepub Jun 2017 #4
As a child, I was taught to revere Lee Wraith20878 Jun 2017 #5

PoindexterOglethorpe

(25,862 posts)
3. Keep this thread going,
Tue Jun 6, 2017, 11:15 AM
Jun 2017

but there was an earlier discussion on this topic here.

https://www.democraticunderground.com/10029157581

This does need to be brought up more than once. I, for one, have gotten heartily sick of the glossing over of the truth about slavery, the Civil War, and Robert E. Lee. As I said in the other thread, he was a traitor, and romanticizing his choosing his state over his country is wrong.

modrepub

(3,496 posts)
4. Reckless General/Poor Planner
Tue Jun 6, 2017, 11:51 AM
Jun 2017

I don't particularly think Lee was a great general; maybe against some rather incompetent generals who lead the early eastern armies he matched up well. He was aggressive, which worked well if one followed the "seize the high ground and fight defensively" strategy that won most civil war engagements. He was probably also helped with competent corps commanders such as Jackson and Longstreet but if you judge him by his to invasions of the north he failed miserably.

Lee's best chance to turn the war around came during the Gettysburg Campaign. Interestingly, Longstreet favored sending troops from the Army of Northern Virginia to relieve Vicksburg after Lee's brilliant victory at Chancellorsville but he was overruled by Davis and Lee. Keep in mind Lincoln replaced the commander of the Army of the Potomac the night before the Battle of Gettysburg began, with someone not well known or even senior in command. Lee had no objective for his invasion of Pennsylvania and that explains why he lost his cavalry (Stuart) leaving him with no means of reconnoitering where the Army of the Potomac was. A chance engagement near Gettysburg set in motion a gathering of forces that Lee seemed to have little control over. Instead of driving towards Harrisburg and cutting off the east-west railroads that crossed there Lee's army turned south and threw themselves against a well defended position. It's fitting in my mind that Lee's gamble was lost on his inability to fight logically. His counterpart, Maj Gen Meade knew from Fredericksburg seizing the high ground and fighting from a position of strength would carry the day. To that end he assembled all his units in strong positions (well before his southern counterparts showed up on the field) and parried Lee's attacks from a position of strength. Afterwards Lee would offer his resignation, recognizing he had bumbled the South's last and best chance to win their independence.

Wraith20878

(181 posts)
5. As a child, I was taught to revere Lee
Tue Jun 6, 2017, 12:25 PM
Jun 2017

And despise Grant. As an adult, the more I read about them, the more I dislike Lee, and the more I like Grant. Excellent article!

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»The Myth of the Kindly Ge...