Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Why Nations Fail by Daron Acemoglu and James Robinson – review
http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2012/mar/11/why-nations-fail-acemoglu-robinson-reviewBuilders in Shenyang, China: party control will not permit a full ascent to prosperity. Photograph: AP
As the turbulence of global economic crisis starts to recede, the two fundamental features of the world economy in our times re-emerge. One is the gap between rich and poor countries. Two hundred years ago, there was no such gap, at least not on the scale we are used to today; nor, most probably, will there be one in 200 years' time. But the present reality is of astounding difference: the same people can live in abject poverty in one country, yet be prosperous once they move to another.
This book takes the graphic example of the twin towns of Nogales, one on the Mexican side of the border, the other on the American side: why does a border make such a difference? Self-evidently, this question matters, because unacceptable global inequality generates other brute facts: the psychologies of guilt and resentment; escalating pressures for migration; and the nightmare choices that face the world when some nations do not merely fall behind, but fall apart.
Scholars have struggled for decades to find a convincing answer. Often, the direction of search has been technocratic. In the 1960s, the dominant explanation was that poor countries lacked capital; by the 1980s, it was that they had poor economic policies.
The last decade has appeared to offer a new and potent clue: the ascent of China, which is the other fundamental feature of our times. China's growth is an economic phenomenon without precedent that has implications both for poverty and geopolitics. It has lifted millions out of penury and the country is projected soon to topple America from its position as the world's largest economy. The beacon offered by China has been widely interpreted, especially by African elites, as demonstrating the benefits of autocracy.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 1331 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (0)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Why Nations Fail by Daron Acemoglu and James Robinson – review (Original Post)
xchrom
Mar 2012
OP
bemildred
(90,061 posts)1. To put it another way:
The short term self-interest of the already well-off and powerful is not at all the same thing as the long term interest of the body-politic as a whole.
xchrom
(108,903 posts)2. well said. nt
bemildred
(90,061 posts)3. That was an interesting read.
When I was younger, when we still paid more than lip service to the notion of being a beacon of freedom and democracy to the world, the argument was made, that a free and democratic society was stronger for that fact. It's "why we won WWII". So the idea is not new. And obvious too, legitimacy confers power, that's why politicians want it. But not an argument I've seen much of lately from fellows of this sort.
xchrom
(108,903 posts)4. sometime during the Cold War -- we made a conscious decision against exporting democracy.
because i have the same memories you do.
it seems like we doubled down on the idea that the business of america was business.
so much so -- that we've deprived ourselves of democracy.