Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DonViejo

(60,536 posts)
Sat Jun 17, 2017, 08:36 AM Jun 2017

Being soft on sentencing means more violent crime. It's time to get tough again. - By Jeff Sessions

By Jeff Sessions June 16 at 8:11 PM
Jeff Sessions is U.S. attorney general.

Drug trafficking is an inherently violent business. If you want to collect a drug debt, you can’t, and don’t, file a lawsuit in court. You collect it by the barrel of a gun. For the approximately 52,000 Americans who died of a drug overdose in 2015, drug trafficking was a deadly business.

Yet in 2013, subject to limited exceptions, the Justice Department ordered federal prosecutors not to include in charging documents the amount of drugs being dealt when the actual amount was large enough to trigger a mandatory minimum sentence. Prosecutors were required to leave out objective facts in order to achieve sentences lighter than required by law. This was billed as an effort to curb mass incarceration of low-level offenders, but in reality it covered offenders apprehended with large quantities of dangerous drugs. The result was that federal drug prosecutions went down dramatically — from 2011 to 2016, federal prosecutions fell by 23?percent. Meanwhile, the average sentence length for a convicted federal drug offender decreased 18 percent from 2009 to 2016.

Before that policy change, the violent crime rate in the United States had fallen steadily for two decades, reaching half of what it was in 1991. Within one year after the Justice Department softened its approach to drug offenders, the trend of decreasing violent crime reversed. In 2015, the United States suffered the largest single-year increase in the overall violent crime rate since 1991.

And while defenders of the 2013 policy change point out that crime rates remain low compared with where they were 30 years ago, they neglect to recognize a disturbing trend that could reverse decades of progress: Violent crime is rising across the country. According to data from the FBI, there were more than 15,000 murders in the United States in 2015, representing a single-year increase of nearly 11?percent across the country. That was the largest increase since 1971 .

more
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/jeff-sessions-being-soft-on-sentencing-means-more-violent-crime-its-time-to-get-tough-again/2017/06/16/618ef1fe-4a19-11e7-9669-250d0b15f83b_story.html

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Being soft on sentencing means more violent crime. It's time to get tough again. - By Jeff Sessions (Original Post) DonViejo Jun 2017 OP
Okay Jeffie, Zoonart Jun 2017 #1
heh heh heh he and the other vile henchmen luvMIdog Jun 2017 #2
+1 dalton99a Jun 2017 #5
I agree - as long as it starts with beefing up penalties for OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE! bagelsforbreakfast Jun 2017 #3
Bless his heart, he's trying to use disproven tactics from 20-30 years ago. procon Jun 2017 #4

procon

(15,805 posts)
4. Bless his heart, he's trying to use disproven tactics from 20-30 years ago.
Sat Jun 17, 2017, 09:33 AM
Jun 2017

Keep up, Beauregard! Your ideas didn't work then, and promoting flawed theories that were rejected back in the day, still won't work now.

Seriously, if you are this far behind the curve then you're just wasting our tax dollars and we're getting nothing in return. Going backward is not the solution, and you look foolish for not being smart enough to know that. Advances in law enforcement and sentencing and prison reforms have rejected everything you're promoting. Don't you read the studies? Are you aware of what other countries are doing and their success rate compared to ours?



Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»Being soft on sentencing ...