The Problem With Participatory Democracy Is the Participants
At backyard barbecues this holiday weekend, liberals will gab with one another about how much time theyre spending on politics. More than ever, they are watching cable news, and refreshing Twitter and Facebook feeds.
Many kept up with the recent special House elections. Some skipped work to watch the spectacle of James Comeys Senate hearing. Others have been using a new technology called Resistbot to send text messages that are transformed into letters faxed to a representatives or senators office. Yet, for all this activism, they have a sinking feeling that maybe theyre just spinning their wheels.
Americans who live in relative comfort are emotionally invested in politics, especially in the aftermath of the election, but in a degraded form of politics that caters to the voyeurism of news junkies and the short attention spans of slacktivists. They are engaging in a phenomenon I call political hobbyism. They desperately want to do something, but not something that is boring, demanding or slow.
Political hobbyists want easy ways to register their feelings. Democrats in particular embrace tools like Resistbot that offer instantly gratifying participation. Beyond the current political climate, Democrats, more than Republicans, believe in mass participation as a core value and also believe it empowers their side.
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/06/29/opinion/sunday/the-problem-with-participatory-democracy-is-the-participants.html?action=click&pgtype=Homepage&clickSource=story-heading&module=opinion-c-col-right-region®ion=opinion-c-col-right-region&WT.nav=opinion-c-col-right-region