Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

question everything

(47,534 posts)
Mon Aug 28, 2017, 04:15 PM Aug 2017

Powerbull: The Lottery Loves Poverty

What is America’s national antipoverty strategy? Apparently, the Powerball lottery. All across the country last week, millions of people lined up for hours to get their shot at a payout that would end their financial struggles. On Wednesday night, one ticketholder won a $759 million jackpot. That sounds like a lot until you hear the government’s take.

Powerball—the lottery shared by 44 states, the District of Columbia and two territories—is just one of the sweepstakes run by 47 jurisdictions in the U.S. These games produce nearly $70 billion a year in government revenue and enjoy profits of about 33%—much higher than margins in the private gambling industry.

Who are these lotteries’ most loyal customers? Poor people. Lots of folks buy the occasional ticket, but studies have long shown a steady association between poverty and lottery play. Many scholars report that the poorest third of Americans buy more than half of all lotto tickets, which is why states advertise so aggressively in poor neighborhoods.

Harmless entertainment, you may say, but poor people don’t see it that way. They tend to view lottery tickets as an investment. .. Hardly a surprise, since this is the idea that lottery advertising is selling. In California, the slogan is, “Imagine what a buck could do!” In New York? “Hey, you never know.” Scholars have dug up evidence that states intentionally direct such ads at vulnerable citizens. A marketing plan for Ohio’s lottery some years back recommended scheduling campaigns to coincide with the distribution of “government benefits, payroll and Social Security payments.”

(snip)

What’s the social cost of all this? Ms. Kearney says lottery players finance their tickets largely by cutting spending on necessities. After a state introduces the lotto, the bottom third of households shift about 3% of their food expenditures and 7% of their mortgage payments, rent and other bills. Effectively, the lottery works like a regressive tax.

(snip)

Politicians who profess a desire to alleviate poverty often lament how few levers they have to pull. So here’s a novel idea: Stop selling poor people a mirage of the American dream at the end of a convenience-store line.

Mr. Brooks is president of the American Enterprise Institute.

https://www.wsj.com/articles/powerbull-the-lottery-loves-poverty-1503868287

(If you google the title you may be able to find the complete story, or on twitter, I am told)

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Powerbull: The Lottery Loves Poverty (Original Post) question everything Aug 2017 OP
Before Georgia got it there were stories about this Phentex Aug 2017 #1
It is legalized gambling. Look at the casinos in Vegas... BigmanPigman Aug 2017 #2
People know the odds are astronomically against them ... earthshine Aug 2017 #3
The "free access via Twitter" didn't work for me on a couple of articles I tried yesterday. mahatmakanejeeves Aug 2017 #4
It's a tax MosheFeingold Aug 2017 #5
Also, 600-700 winners of $1 million each would be better SharonAnn Sep 2017 #6
I know. Agree with everything that you said question everything Sep 2017 #7

Phentex

(16,334 posts)
1. Before Georgia got it there were stories about this
Mon Aug 28, 2017, 06:09 PM
Aug 2017

and I even saw a billboard that tried to explain it. But people were blinded by the thought of scholarships for college and the pre-k program. It helps some people and hurts others but there was a clear link about the poorest of poor buying the tickets.

BigmanPigman

(51,627 posts)
2. It is legalized gambling. Look at the casinos in Vegas...
Mon Aug 28, 2017, 07:16 PM
Aug 2017

the same poor people choose to lose tons (it is entertainment) and the casinos prosper. However their profit margin is over 33%.

 

earthshine

(1,642 posts)
3. People know the odds are astronomically against them ...
Tue Aug 29, 2017, 02:37 AM
Aug 2017

yet, they still think it's their best chance out of poverty.

mahatmakanejeeves

(57,600 posts)
4. The "free access via Twitter" didn't work for me on a couple of articles I tried yesterday.
Tue Aug 29, 2017, 11:38 AM
Aug 2017

I think TWSJ. has closed that loophole.

SharonAnn

(13,778 posts)
6. Also, 600-700 winners of $1 million each would be better
Sat Sep 2, 2017, 02:28 PM
Sep 2017

But then there would be fewer tickets sold. Think about it. A chance for $1 million versus a worse chance for $600 million.

Crazy.

question everything

(47,534 posts)
7. I know. Agree with everything that you said
Sat Sep 2, 2017, 11:28 PM
Sep 2017

I might even consider purchase one with a better distribution. But, alas, people want the biggest, loudest, toughest - whatever.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»Powerbull: The Lottery Lo...