Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Eugene

(61,896 posts)
Tue Aug 29, 2017, 08:01 AM Aug 2017

Ted Cruz's claim that two-thirds of the Hurricane Sandy bill 'had nothing to do with Sandy'

Source: Washington Post

Ted Cruz’s claim that two-thirds of the Hurricane Sandy bill ‘had nothing to do with Sandy’

By Glenn Kessler August 29 at 3:00 AM

“The problem with that particular bill is it became a $50 billion bill that was filled with unrelated pork. Two-thirds of that bill had nothing to do with Sandy.”
— Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Tex.), interview with NBC’s Katy Tur, Aug. 28, 2017

Hypocrisy watch! Now that Houston and much of southeastern Texas is swamped by Hurricane Harvey, critics (including Northeastern lawmakers) have complained that Texas senators and members of Congress are seeking emergency federal aid but refused to back relief for the victims of Hurricane Sandy in 2012.

The defense, as shown in the quote above by Cruz, is that the Sandy legislation was a bad bill, filled with pork-barrel projects. A similar defense is indicated by a spokesman for Cruz’s colleague, Sen. John Cronyn (R) — that he did vote for Sandy aid, just not the bad bill that was signed into law.

-snip-

The Pinocchio Test

Cruz is repeating a number of myths about the funding for Sandy disaster relief. The vast majority of the spending was for Hurricane Sandy, including elements (such as Smithsonian repairs) that some lawmakers incorrectly believed were unrelated to the storm. The slow rate of projected spending that Cruz had criticized at the time was actually based on how quickly the government had spent funds after previous major storms.

As we noted, we suspect Cruz misspoke about the “two-thirds.” Still, it is wildly incorrect to claim that the bill was “filled with unrelated pork.” The bill was largely aimed at dealing with Sandy, along with relatively minor items to address other or future disasters. He earns Three Pinocchios.

Read more: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/fact-checker/wp/2017/08/29/ted-cruzs-claim-that-two-thirds-of-the-hurricane-sandy-bill-had-nothing-to-do-with-sandy/


3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Ted Cruz's claim that two-thirds of the Hurricane Sandy bill 'had nothing to do with Sandy' (Original Post) Eugene Aug 2017 OP
Doesn't matter. Lying is the new norm. He got his message out about pork and, chelsea0011 Aug 2017 #1
Alt facts right? Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Aug 2017 #3
Well I am sure Governor Bridgegate siphoned off a good share of the Sandy money. yellowcanine Aug 2017 #2

chelsea0011

(10,115 posts)
1. Doesn't matter. Lying is the new norm. He got his message out about pork and,
Tue Aug 29, 2017, 08:09 AM
Aug 2017

that is allt hat matters now.

yellowcanine

(35,699 posts)
2. Well I am sure Governor Bridgegate siphoned off a good share of the Sandy money.
Tue Aug 29, 2017, 01:27 PM
Aug 2017

So he may have a teeny point. Just sayin'

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»Ted Cruz's claim that two...