Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
THE IC FACTOR (from 2006)
Source: The New Yorker
...
An alternative view is that its called the Democratic Party. The Democratic Party itself takes this view, and many nonpartisan authorities agree. The American Heritage College Dictionary, for example, defines the noun Democratic Party as One of the two major US political parties, owing its origin to a split in the Democratic-Republican Party under Andrew Jackson in 1828. (It defines Democrat n as A Democratic Party member and Democratic adj as Of, relating to, or characteristic of the Democratic Party, but gives no definition forindeed, makes no mention ofDemocrat Party n or Democrat adj.) Other dictionaries, and reference works generally, appear to be unanimous on these points. The broader literate public also comes down on the Democratic side, as indicated by frequency of usage. A Google search for Democratic Party yields around forty million hits. Democrat Party fetches fewer than two million.
Theres no great mystery about the motives behind this deliberate misnaming. Democrat Party is a slur, or intended to bea handy way to express contempt. Aesthetic judgments are subjective, of course, but Democrat Party is jarring verging on ugly. It fairly screams rat. At a slightly higher level of sophistication, its an attempt to deny the enemy the positive connotations of its chosen appellation. During the Cold War, many people bridled at obvious misnomers like German Democratic Republic, and perhaps there are some members of the Republican Party (which, come to think of it, has been drifting toward monarchism of late) who genuinely regard the Democratic Party as undemocratic. Perhaps there are some who hope to induce it to go out of existence by refusing to call it by its name, à la terming Israel the Zionist entity. And no doubt there are plenty of others who say Democrat Party just to needle the other side while signalling solidarity with their ownthe partisan equivalent of flashing a gang sign.
The history of Democrat Party is hard to pin down with any precision, though etymologists have traced its use to as far back as the Harding Administration. According to William Safire, it got a boost in 1940 from Harold Stassen, the Republican Convention keynoter that year, who used it to signify disapproval of such less than fully democratic Democratic machine bosses as Frank Hague of Jersey City and Tom Pendergast of Kansas City. Senator Joseph McCarthy made it a regular part of his arsenal of insults, which served to dampen its popularity for a while. There was another spike in 1976, when grumpy, growly Bob Dole denounced Democrat wars (those were the days!) in his Vice-Presidential debate with Walter Mondale. Growth has been steady for the last couple of decades, and today we find ourselves in a golden age of anti-ic-ism.
In the conservative media, the phenomenon feeds more voraciously the closer you get to the mucky, sludgy bottom. Democrat Party is standard jargon on right-wing talk radio and common on winger Web sites like NewsMax.com, which blue-pencils Associated Press dispatches to de-ic references to the Party of F.D.R. and J.F.K. (The resulting impression that Democrat Party is O.K. with the A.P. is as phony as a North Korean travel brochure.) The respectable conservative journals of opinion sprinkle the phrase around their Web sites but go light on it in their print editions. William F. Buckley, Jr., the Miss Manners cum Dr. Johnson of modern conservatism, dealt with the question in a 2000 column in National Review, the magazine he had founded forty-five years before. I have an aversion to Democrat as an adjective, Buckley began.
An alternative view is that its called the Democratic Party. The Democratic Party itself takes this view, and many nonpartisan authorities agree. The American Heritage College Dictionary, for example, defines the noun Democratic Party as One of the two major US political parties, owing its origin to a split in the Democratic-Republican Party under Andrew Jackson in 1828. (It defines Democrat n as A Democratic Party member and Democratic adj as Of, relating to, or characteristic of the Democratic Party, but gives no definition forindeed, makes no mention ofDemocrat Party n or Democrat adj.) Other dictionaries, and reference works generally, appear to be unanimous on these points. The broader literate public also comes down on the Democratic side, as indicated by frequency of usage. A Google search for Democratic Party yields around forty million hits. Democrat Party fetches fewer than two million.
Theres no great mystery about the motives behind this deliberate misnaming. Democrat Party is a slur, or intended to bea handy way to express contempt. Aesthetic judgments are subjective, of course, but Democrat Party is jarring verging on ugly. It fairly screams rat. At a slightly higher level of sophistication, its an attempt to deny the enemy the positive connotations of its chosen appellation. During the Cold War, many people bridled at obvious misnomers like German Democratic Republic, and perhaps there are some members of the Republican Party (which, come to think of it, has been drifting toward monarchism of late) who genuinely regard the Democratic Party as undemocratic. Perhaps there are some who hope to induce it to go out of existence by refusing to call it by its name, à la terming Israel the Zionist entity. And no doubt there are plenty of others who say Democrat Party just to needle the other side while signalling solidarity with their ownthe partisan equivalent of flashing a gang sign.
The history of Democrat Party is hard to pin down with any precision, though etymologists have traced its use to as far back as the Harding Administration. According to William Safire, it got a boost in 1940 from Harold Stassen, the Republican Convention keynoter that year, who used it to signify disapproval of such less than fully democratic Democratic machine bosses as Frank Hague of Jersey City and Tom Pendergast of Kansas City. Senator Joseph McCarthy made it a regular part of his arsenal of insults, which served to dampen its popularity for a while. There was another spike in 1976, when grumpy, growly Bob Dole denounced Democrat wars (those were the days!) in his Vice-Presidential debate with Walter Mondale. Growth has been steady for the last couple of decades, and today we find ourselves in a golden age of anti-ic-ism.
In the conservative media, the phenomenon feeds more voraciously the closer you get to the mucky, sludgy bottom. Democrat Party is standard jargon on right-wing talk radio and common on winger Web sites like NewsMax.com, which blue-pencils Associated Press dispatches to de-ic references to the Party of F.D.R. and J.F.K. (The resulting impression that Democrat Party is O.K. with the A.P. is as phony as a North Korean travel brochure.) The respectable conservative journals of opinion sprinkle the phrase around their Web sites but go light on it in their print editions. William F. Buckley, Jr., the Miss Manners cum Dr. Johnson of modern conservatism, dealt with the question in a 2000 column in National Review, the magazine he had founded forty-five years before. I have an aversion to Democrat as an adjective, Buckley began.
Read more: https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2006/08/07/the-ic-factor
Another article: http://articles.latimes.com/2007/jan/30/nation/na-democrat30
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
0 replies, 676 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (2)
ReplyReply to this post