Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin

(108,033 posts)
Tue Dec 19, 2017, 05:39 PM Dec 2017

Ivankas store latest tenant at Trump Family Swamp

The presidency was never meant to be a profit center for a nepotistic, money-grubbing family. But that was before the Trumps moved in.

This scandal is lying in plain sight, overlooked because of the constant stream of missteps, outrages and distractions that come and go at an exhausting pace. While everyone watches his Twitter feed, President Trump is using the White House like a marketing agency for his family brand. This is not normal or acceptable — and it surely isn’t what laid-off factory workers and coal miners had in mind when they jumped on the “populist” Trump train.

Last week, Ivanka Trump opened a retail store inside Trump Tower, her father’s New York skyscraper, to sell her eponymous foreign-made handbags and other items. We can now finally dispense with the notion that she is an “unpaid” adviser to the president.

It’s not a very big store — more of a glorified kiosk, really — but the conflict of interest is obvious. She and her husband, Jared Kushner, are in positions where they can influence U.S. policy toward the countries where her products are made, such as China, Indonesia, Vietnam, India and Bangladesh. The store is located where it can siphon money from Trump-supporting tourists who make pilgrimages to Trump Tower while visiting the sights of Manhattan.

This is just the latest example of how the Trump family is seeking to monetize the presidency. We haven’t seen anything like it since 1977, when Jimmy Carter’s brother started hawking Billy Beer. (President Carter, at least, had the decency to be embarrassed.)

As is the case with other family members, including the president, Ivanka Trump has refused to divest herself of her business interests. Instead, the Trumps and Kushner have put them into trusts — but in a way that provides not even a fig leaf of probity.

http://www.heraldnet.com/opinion/robinson-ivankas-store-latest-tenant-at-trump-family-swamp/?utm_source=DAILY+HERALD&utm_campaign=232a67251e-RSS_EMAIL_CAMPAIGN&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_d81d073bb4-232a67251e-228635337

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Ivankas store latest tenant at Trump Family Swamp (Original Post) Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Dec 2017 OP
They're doing all of it Faux pas Dec 2017 #1
I Bought Some Billy Beer SeaDoo77 Dec 2017 #2
Do you remember when... syringis Dec 2017 #3
Seems there were Scarsdale Dec 2017 #4
Hello Scarsdale syringis Dec 2017 #5

syringis

(5,101 posts)
3. Do you remember when...
Tue Dec 19, 2017, 06:07 PM
Dec 2017

...Meliana sued the Daily Mail ?

"Melania Trump missed out on ‘once-in-a-lifetime opportunity’ to make millions during the years she will be of the most photographed women in the world" argued her lawyers.

In short, the position of first lady, is nothing more than a business showcase...

Scarsdale

(9,426 posts)
4. Seems there were
Wed Dec 20, 2017, 12:37 PM
Dec 2017

more photos of her published, NAKED, than while she has resided at the WH. How would she have made millions, she hardly speaks
English, and looks mean as a rattlesnake. She sued them for $150 million, but they must have questioned the truth of HER statements, and she only got $1.5

syringis

(5,101 posts)
5. Hello Scarsdale
Wed Dec 20, 2017, 12:55 PM
Dec 2017

Plus, she sued them wrongly. Because they did not claim she was an escort. they reported what was said in a slovenian publication.
They should have vet the info. That's what was wrong with DM. Assuming of course, she was not escort.

I never heard of her as being model...I may be wrong, I always thought a model was supposed to show clothes, underclothes,...

Unless painter's models, I don't understand well what a nude model is supposed to sell ?

Most pictures I've seen of this "classy first lady" according to RW, are nude or almost nude. I'm baffled she managed to keep her clothes on since january...


Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»Ivankas store latest tena...