Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
The Truth about Goldman Sachs
from the American Prospect:
The Truth about Goldman Sachs
Wallace Turbeville
March 15, 2012
The investment firm headed south as soon as it started prioritizing short-term gain over its long-term interests.
Former Goldman Sachs employee Greg Smith wrote an op-ed in yesterdays New York Times that simmers with pathos. Smith describes the devolution of the culture at Goldman: Whereas in the past, the company worked in the interests of its clients, they are now seen merely as the source of transactional profit, to be manipulated for the benefit of the firm. His story emerges in the midst of a huge effort by Wall Street to eviscerate and delay the implementation of the Volcker Rule, which limits bank traders to running a client-service businesses by prohibiting trading for the banks own account.
Having spent 12 years at Goldman prior to 1997, I sympathize with Smiths feelings of loss and betrayal. I left just at the beginning of the institutions evolution into its current form and have observed the process with despairnot only for the organization but for the loss suffered by the nation. Some context might provide greater meaning to Mr. Smiths story.
At its best, Wall Street serves an important function. Historically, it provided the wherewithal for growth in industries as varied as rail and information technology; by bankrolling productive growth of industries that provided jobs and products to sell around the world, it vastly increased the well-being of all Americans. In times of crisis, bankers worked to preserve economic stability. Sometimes, they were genuine altruists, accepting the moral responsibilities that go along with their positions of wealth and power. More often, they were simply pursuing their own self-interest. Was J.P. Morgan a robber baron or the man who almost single-handedly saved the economy in the panic of 1907? The answer is both. But altruistic or not, bankers understood their enormous stake in the long-term vitality of the economy. Preserving the health of the economy was good for business this year and for decades to come. That was the contract between Main Street and Wall Street.
When I arrived at Goldman Sachs, John Weinberg headed the firm. It was a partnership of professionals then, not a publicly traded corporation, and the partners wealth was largely invested in the firm. I saw Weinberg, a Marine veteran of the Pacific campaigns, many mornings on the elevator with a muffin perched on a Styrofoam coffee cup, his briefcase in his other hand. He had just arrived at 85 Broad Street in his Ford (Ford was a longtime personal client). His appearance was closer to the guy behind the counter at the deli than the titan of Wall Street that he was. When he spoke, he was incisive and wise. His motto for Goldman Sachs (coined by his predecessor Gus Levy) was, Be long-term greedy, not short-term greedy. ...................(more)
The complete piece is at: http://prospect.org/article/truth-about-goldman-sachs
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 1237 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (4)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Truth about Goldman Sachs (Original Post)
marmar
Mar 2012
OP
Alan Greenspan had it all wrong when he said that capitalists have virtue and trustworthyness.
rhett o rick
Mar 2012
#2
xchrom
(108,903 posts)1. du rec. nt
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)2. Alan Greenspan had it all wrong when he said that capitalists have virtue and trustworthyness.
Alan is a sap that worshiped Ayn Rand. In her fantasy world capitalists had virtue and morals, however, in the real world vice wins out every time.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/11168315
DonCoquixote
(13,616 posts)3. ugly bit of truth
"As the leadership evolved from the greatest generation to the baby boomers, the underpinnings of the culture decayed. " Sorry, tis true. Some Bommers were the peacelovedope hippies, but many became outright monsters.
yurbud
(39,405 posts)4. the must have seen BOILER ROOM together and decided it was a good business model
there's a scene in the movie when the huckster stock brokers get in a pissing match with the ''real'' ones, and the irony is the only difference between them in real life is their pedigrees, not their methods or goals.