Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin

(108,034 posts)
Fri Jan 26, 2018, 06:32 PM Jan 2018

The Mueller confrontation that Republicans were trying to avoid has just arrived

The firing of special counsel Robert S. Mueller III has long been a red line for most Republicans in Congress who are trying to work with their president.

But it's a red line they'd rather not act on — and now, with news that President Trump actually made moves to do it, they may be forced to.

There are two bills in Congress, both of which have some Republican support, that would protect Mueller from being fired by Trump. But neither bill has been seriously considered by leadership.

Up until this point, Republicans had given Trump the benefit of the doubt that he wouldn't launch a constitutional crisis. From their perspective, why take action and cause a confrontation with the president (and jeopardize their agenda) if they don't absolutely have to?

Now they may now have to.

Trump moved to fire Mueller in June, shortly after the special counsel took over the investigation of Russia meddling in the 2016 election, the New York Times, then The Washington Post, reported on Thursday night. Trump seemed pretty dead set on it, and only backed off after the White House's top lawyer, Donald F. McGahn, threatened to resign.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/analysis-the-mueller-confrontation-that-republicans-were-trying-to-avoid-has-just-arrived/ar-AAvcdN9?li=BBnb7Kz&ocid=edgsp

2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Mueller confrontation that Republicans were trying to avoid has just arrived (Original Post) Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Jan 2018 OP
I never understood this. Doesn't such bills need POTUS signature to have force of law? yodermon Jan 2018 #1
Yes, he could veto it More_Cowbell Jan 2018 #2

yodermon

(6,143 posts)
1. I never understood this. Doesn't such bills need POTUS signature to have force of law?
Fri Jan 26, 2018, 06:41 PM
Jan 2018

Do they have a veto-proof majority for it in both houses?

What am I missing?

More_Cowbell

(2,191 posts)
2. Yes, he could veto it
Fri Jan 26, 2018, 09:33 PM
Jan 2018

And Congress could override his veto if they have the votes. It was evident that if Trump didn't sign the Russia sanctions bill, Congress would override his veto, so he signed it to avoid that humiliation.

The law could also be ruled an unconstitutional violation of the separation of powers.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»The Mueller confrontation...