Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

CTyankee

(63,912 posts)
Fri Feb 2, 2018, 06:14 PM Feb 2018

David Brooks column on abortion rights in today's NYT

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/02/01/opinion/abortion-democrats-compromise.html

Brooks is infuriating! This column is outrageous. Read this and get ready to get mad as hell.

Roe v. Wade is stare decisus. Brooks should just stop making these bullshit analyses.

I hate it when so-called "reasonable" men on the right sound off like this.

Maybe his analysis is largely correct. I don't know. I just don't like it coming from a right wing male.

OK. Rant over...
10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
David Brooks column on abortion rights in today's NYT (Original Post) CTyankee Feb 2018 OP
So let some women potentially die for the greater good? Freethinker65 Feb 2018 #1
NO! NO! NO! Ohiogal Feb 2018 #2
I counseled a good friend of ours who says his wife never wanted to discuss her decision to have CTyankee Feb 2018 #3
Anti-Abortion is about CONTROL.....Regulate a woman's body. ProudMNDemocrat Feb 2018 #4
Agree 100% Ohiogal Feb 2018 #5
They know... nt uriel1972 Feb 2018 #6
No, it's not remotely correct. RobertoRoberti Feb 2018 #7
Brooks makes millions of dollars writing this shit. At the NY Times. Paladin Feb 2018 #8
I can't wait to read the LTTE that I am sure the NYT is getting... CTyankee Feb 2018 #9
Yeah, I think Brooks really stepped in it, this time. Paladin Feb 2018 #10

Ohiogal

(32,000 posts)
2. NO! NO! NO!
Fri Feb 2, 2018, 06:34 PM
Feb 2018

We NEVER give up a woman's right to choose to the states!

Suppose Texas outlaws all abortions. Texas is a big state. Where does a woman go to get an abortion who lives in Texas? Probably not neighboring Oklahoma, Arkansas, or Kansas. Surely they will outlaw it, too. This puts an undue burden on women who must travel for hours to a clinic out of state, take time off work, come up with the money, etc. Brooks is absolutely WRONG on this! This is something we never give up on!

And I just HATE that phrase "abortion on demand". The Right just loves to use it, as if a woman stomps into a clinic, pounds her fist on the counter, and DEMANDS an abortion RIGHT NOW! Abortion is never easy, it never happens without a great amount of forethought, and it's never used for birth control, as the Right loves to tell us. Plus .... it's none of their goddam business.

And the nerve of a privileged old white guy to be telling us this. Infuriating! Brooks can go F himself.

CTyankee

(63,912 posts)
3. I counseled a good friend of ours who says his wife never wanted to discuss her decision to have
Fri Feb 2, 2018, 06:44 PM
Feb 2018

an abortion. He agreed that it is a woman's right to choose. He said he "just wanted to discuss it but she adamantly refused." I told him it was also her right to not discuss it with him. As it turns out his wife was developing a deepening depression and she is now in a facility just to help her with daily routine activities. I told him that she might well have known this was slowly happening and felt she couldn't cope with another pregnancy. This is a sad situation all around. The woman is rejecting her two daughters, saying that they are the reason she is now so disabled.

He still mourns for the baby boy or girl he never had. Sad, sad, sad...

ProudMNDemocrat

(16,785 posts)
4. Anti-Abortion is about CONTROL.....Regulate a woman's body.
Fri Feb 2, 2018, 06:53 PM
Feb 2018


Those who oppose Abortion do so from a Religious point of view, not from a Legal or Constitutional one. Lawmakers and Anti-Abortion supporters believe that by passing laws that restrict abortion options, close down clinics, prohibit Contraception being covered in Health Insurance plans be it employer provided, etc., demand doctors give women incorrect information in which to intimidate them, and more.

This is mostly MALE lawmakers wanting to CONTROL and REGULATE women.

Ohiogal

(32,000 posts)
5. Agree 100%
Fri Feb 2, 2018, 06:58 PM
Feb 2018

The most puzzling part is how they want to restrict contraceptive availability and sex education. Do they not realize that using contraception is one of the biggest abortion deterrents there is? Duh.

RobertoRoberti

(30 posts)
7. No, it's not remotely correct.
Sat Feb 3, 2018, 01:00 AM
Feb 2018

Brooks trying to pose as a reasonable person is one of the more painful spectacles of our diseased media culture. Everything he writes aims to make the semi-, pseudo-, and would-be-intellectual person feel comfortable with the Republican agenda.

Everyone here should read this:

http://rudepundit.blogspot.ca/2018/02/david-brookss-latest-column-on-abortion.html

Paladin

(28,261 posts)
8. Brooks makes millions of dollars writing this shit. At the NY Times.
Sat Feb 3, 2018, 10:35 AM
Feb 2018

Let that sink in, for just a moment.

CTyankee

(63,912 posts)
9. I can't wait to read the LTTE that I am sure the NYT is getting...
Sat Feb 3, 2018, 11:43 AM
Feb 2018

They wait just a bit and then publish several pro and con letters that have come in. Maybe tomorrow they will. I'll bet they are flooded with them!

Paladin

(28,261 posts)
10. Yeah, I think Brooks really stepped in it, this time.
Sat Feb 3, 2018, 11:54 AM
Feb 2018

Creepy little self-satisfied prick that he is.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»David Brooks column on ab...