Active-Shooter Drills, Psychological Effects on Kids, The Atlantic
Theres always at least one kid in tears, as they huddle under their desks in the dark. Still Beth Manias, an early-elementary literacy teacher outside of Seattle, tries to act upbeat and relaxed. I have them whisper about their favorite candy, dinner, books, movieswhatever, as a distraction, Manias told me. She tells the kids theyre practicing to stay safe in case theres ever a bear on campus. Though, she admits, They always see through this. The older they get, the more savvy they become, probably because they are exposed to more of the news.
At schools across the country, more children are taking part in mandatory active-shooter drills. Forgoing any pretense of a bear, sometimes a faculty member plays the role of a shooter, jiggling doorknobs as children practice keeping perfectly silent. Many parents, teachers, and students say that the experience is somewhere between upsetting and traumatizing. Which may be worthwhile, if it were clear that the drills saved lives.
Active shooter drills came into existence after the Columbine massacre in 1999. What is known of their long-term psychological effects comes from the reports of people now in early adulthood. Ryan Marino, an emergency-medicine physician at the University of Pittsburgh, recalled that his school had adopted the drills during that period, after a student was found to have a death list and access to guns.
He told me the drills didn't seem real until he was 12, and a fellow student coughed during one of the drills. The teacher told us that if this had been real, we would all be dead.
That single experience shaped my childhood, Marino said. Having to practice and prepare for a peer coming to my school and shooting at me and my friends was something that really changed the overall atmosphere. Looking back, it was a major shift in how the world felt.
In the two weeks since the shooting at a high school in Parkland, Florida, new and renewed calls for such drills raise the question of whether they do any goodand if they might be doing harm. The day after the event, Susan Hennessey, the executive editor of Lawfare, tweeted: Feeling mildly nauseous reading a note from my kids preschool about implementing active-shooter drills. Brian Leff, a writer in Los Angeles, told me his fifth-grade daughters principal just announced the school is contemplating a surprise lockdown drill. Now my daughter cant stop thinking about when its going to happen and how shell know if its real or not.
...Despite some similarities to natural-disaster and Cold War drills, active-shooter drills also mean exposing kids to the idea that at any point, someone they know may try to kill them. Its good to do emergency drills, but active shooters are not a drill anyone should have to do, says Meredith Corley, who taught math in Colorado in the aftermath of Columbine. It re-traumatizes kids who have experienced violence. Getting the kids settled back into the work of learning after lockdown drills is a nightmare. That mind-set has no place in a learning environment. Con't..
READ MORE: https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2018/02/effects-of-active-shooter/554150/
Turbineguy
(37,372 posts)were about a possibility. And we had Eisenhower as President. We were pretty sure he wasn't going to do anything stupid.
They should call these drills, "Living in a republican paradise drill".
torius
(1,652 posts)cbreezen
(694 posts)We had earthquake drills when I was a kid.
Sadly, these days, major earthquakes in California are less common than a school shooting.
BigmanPigman
(51,636 posts)and act like everything was normal. Then the staff had a meeting to discuss procedures for new gun safety drills. Up until then I had to partake in emergency drills with my 6th and 1st graders and this included earthquakes (CA). Over Winter Vacation I had been deciding what I would do with my own class since Sandy Hook had a occurred the last day of school before vacation. During the meeting I had to inform the 2nd principal in 4 years that our classroom doors opened out (could not barricade them) and you could only lock them on the outside! That meant that I would have to go outside and get shot at while attempting to lock the door. Kids are not the only ones who do not want to be in this environment.
This is an American obsession. It is also a culture that has been encouraged by our society for at least 100 years. Get rid of the guns and start changing the culture of guns. The 2nd amend is an excuse used by American MALES (99% of gun violence is by men!!!!!). It is time to change it. Start with the media and glorification of violence in TV and films. Start with mom and dad buying their kids guns for gifts. Other countries have mentally ill people but they do not have this American Male macho gun toting attitude. STOP IT NOW! The US has 4.4% of the world population yet 44% of the guns. Do the math!
https://www.vox.com/cards/gun-violence-facts/guns-domestic-violence-united-states-risk
murielm99
(30,769 posts)They terrified me. So did fire drills. I had nightmares. In one dream, I went outside without my brand new coat and got in trouble at home.
I understand why these kids are traumatized.
I taught for a few years, and then subbed. I subbed in schools all over my area. One of the first things I always did was look for the manual on drills. The kids knew what to do. They could always tell me the procedures.
Grammy23
(5,815 posts)On a Sunday afternoon, we were instructed to get in our cars and, depending on where you lived in town, you were to drive to another area on the outskirts of town. I am pretty sure we were given notes at school to remind our parents about the drill.
So we all dutifully climbed into our cars that afternoon. We got into my mothers hulking 1952 Buick Roadmaster and then in orderly fashion, drove in a caravan out to Clinton, which at the time, was at the edge of Jackson. After we got there, as I recall, we got out of our cars, milled around for a short time, chatted among ourselves and waited for the signal we could go back home. All very calm and routine. As if waiting on a nuclear attack is ever routine.
I have no idea who thought this method would ever work in the event of a real attack. There were no shelters where we were to drive. No instructions of what to do after we got there. If Jackson had been ground zero, where we went was just far enough to witness a terrible blast and then get hit by the blast after effects. So I suppose it was just a way to delay the inevitable.
Around the same time, sales of backyard bomb shelters took off. I think I see why, although, for the life of me, I cant figure how they thought they were a solution, given how long the effects of the blast last. Just the practical aspects of sheltering and feeding a family of four for an undetermined amount of time makes me think someone didnt think things through. 😳. Just like the civil defense drills.