Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Scott Pruitt: "It's not about him. He's a functionary. It's about the GOP." (2017)
David Roberts at Vox wrote an AWESOME article in 2017 discussing Pruitt and his relation to the GOP.
https://www.vox.com/science-and-health/2017/3/10/14871696/scott-pruitt-climate-denial
Pruitts remarks sparked a news cycle that is, to this 10-year veteran of the climate beat, extremely and tediously familiar. I could have scripted the whole thing in advance. As always, it seems to me that people are missing the point in two key ways.
Its not about Pruitt, its about the Republican Party
My inbox is groaning with statements from previous EPA administrators, scientists, nonprofits, members of Congress, and assorted others, condemning Pruitts ignorance in florid terms.
But they are all about what Pruitt believes. And in the end, who cares what he believes? He is a functionary, chosen in part to dismantle EPA regulations on greenhouse gases. If it werent him, it would be some other functionary.
The GOPs goal is to block or reverse any policy that would negatively affect its donors and supporters, who are drawn disproportionately from carbon-intensive industries and regions. That is the North Star to protect those constituencies. That means, effectively, blocking any efficacious climate policy (which, almost by definition, will diminish fossil fuels).
They cant just say that, though, so they have to retrofit a set of beliefs that justify inaction on climate change. Those beliefs shift around depending on context and can be maddeningly difficult to pin down. Among friendly audiences, Republicans are prone to dismiss climate change as a hoax. In public settings like Congressional hearings, they are more likely to adopt lukewarmism, accepting that climate change is happening (thus dodging the awkward denier label), waving their hands vaguely in the direction of action, but always emphasizing the uncertainties in the science and the grave economic dangers of any proposed policy solution.
Its not about Pruitt, its about the Republican Party
My inbox is groaning with statements from previous EPA administrators, scientists, nonprofits, members of Congress, and assorted others, condemning Pruitts ignorance in florid terms.
But they are all about what Pruitt believes. And in the end, who cares what he believes? He is a functionary, chosen in part to dismantle EPA regulations on greenhouse gases. If it werent him, it would be some other functionary.
The GOPs goal is to block or reverse any policy that would negatively affect its donors and supporters, who are drawn disproportionately from carbon-intensive industries and regions. That is the North Star to protect those constituencies. That means, effectively, blocking any efficacious climate policy (which, almost by definition, will diminish fossil fuels).
They cant just say that, though, so they have to retrofit a set of beliefs that justify inaction on climate change. Those beliefs shift around depending on context and can be maddeningly difficult to pin down. Among friendly audiences, Republicans are prone to dismiss climate change as a hoax. In public settings like Congressional hearings, they are more likely to adopt lukewarmism, accepting that climate change is happening (thus dodging the awkward denier label), waving their hands vaguely in the direction of action, but always emphasizing the uncertainties in the science and the grave economic dangers of any proposed policy solution.
But the reason GOP beliefs on climate are so difficult to pin down is that the beliefs are not the point. The partys institutional opposition to action is the point. The beliefs are retrofit, on an opportunistic and sometimes case-by-case basis, to support the conclusion, which is: do nothing.
Pruitt is an avowed opponent of EPA who has spent his professional life suing it to stop it from regulating greenhouse gases. He was chosen to stop action on climate change. What he believes, or claims to believe, while doing so is ultimately not that important.
Alone among major parties in the developed world, the GOP rejects the need to act on climate change. Thats the outrage. Pruitt is an epiphenomenon.
Pruitt is an avowed opponent of EPA who has spent his professional life suing it to stop it from regulating greenhouse gases. He was chosen to stop action on climate change. What he believes, or claims to believe, while doing so is ultimately not that important.
Alone among major parties in the developed world, the GOP rejects the need to act on climate change. Thats the outrage. Pruitt is an epiphenomenon.
That article is maybe the best article of 2017. David Roberts is a smart guy and a great journalist. I try to read everything he writes.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
7 replies, 2519 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (35)
ReplyReply to this post
7 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Scott Pruitt: "It's not about him. He's a functionary. It's about the GOP." (2017) (Original Post)
american_ideals
Apr 2018
OP
But maybe one that isnt so paranoid as to need an army of security around the clock
notdarkyet
Apr 2018
#2
Phoenix61
(17,006 posts)1. Completely agree. Sadly, if it wasn't him
it would be some other treason weasel.
notdarkyet
(2,226 posts)2. But maybe one that isnt so paranoid as to need an army of security around the clock
Jets to places he has no business in,and in general runs up huge bills to the taxpayers. Oh well, from what Ive read hes pretty ineffective at his pursuits because anyone who cares about the epa has left, so his efforts to get rid of regulations are mostly falling flat in the courts.
yonder
(9,666 posts)3. thanks for the post, David Roberts is now on my radar.
Beartracks
(12,816 posts)4. The GOP rejects "mainstream media, academia, and government...
... the shared institutions and norms that bind us together. "
========
american_ideals
(613 posts)7. And those are the things we need to defend and rebuild.
dalton99a
(81,515 posts)5. Kick
disndat
(1,887 posts)6. Of course.
The Koch Bros. and the Mercers with their endless wealth.