Paul Krugman: Oh, What a Stupid Trade War
So, the trade war is on. And what a stupid trade war it is.
-snip-
The official and legal justification for the steel and aluminum tariffs is national security. Thats an obviously fraudulent rationale, given that the main direct victims are democratic allies. But Trump and co. presumably dont care about telling lies with regard to economic policy, since thats what they do about everything. They would see it as all fair game if the policy delivered job gains Trump could trumpet. Will it?
-snip-
And the answer, almost surely, is that this trade war will actually be a job-killer, not a job-creator, for two reasons.
First, Trump is putting tariffs on intermediate goods goods that are used as inputs into the production of other things, some of which themselves have to compete on world markets. Most obviously, cars and other durable manufactured goods will become more expensive to produce, which means that well sell less of them; and whatever gains there are in primary metals employment will be offset by job losses in downstream industries.
Playing with the numbers, it seems highly likely that even this direct effect is a net negative for employment.
Second, other countries will retaliate against U.S. exports, costing jobs in everything from motorcycles to sausages.
In some ways this situation reminds me of George W. Bushs steel tariffs, which were motivated in part by hubris: the Bush administration thought of America as the worlds unchallengeable superpower, which we were in military terms; they failed to recognize that we were by no means equally dominant in economics and trade, and had a lot to lose from trade conflict. They quickly got schooled by an angry European Union, and backed down.
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/05/31/opinion/oh-what-a-stupid-trade-war-very-slightly-wonkish.html
underpants
(182,834 posts)This year our business has experienced significant, unplanned increases across major commodity markets - including crude, aluminum, and PET (polyethylene terephthalate) - along with unprecedented rises in transportation and logistics costs. Aluminum tariffs represent further unplanned inflation.
Price increases will take effect July 1, 2018.
Signed
Senior VP PepsiCo Foodservice Field Sales
Blue_Adept
(6,399 posts)I can only speak anecdotally when it comes to Pepsi. I follow the pricing on the 2-liter bottles for... reasons. My local Cumbies does a buy one ($1.69) get another for $1, which basically puts them both at just under $1.50. Pretty good for a convenience store, especially since the next size bottle down, in the cooler, is $1.89 on average. Three times as much for less price.
Market Basket is where I tend to buy more and average is $1.69 for a 2-liter. But they regularly run sales, such as today, where it's .99 cent bottles. Which is what they price their 1.5 "handheld" liter bottles at.
So, do they nix sales? That's never good because it gets them prime placement at the front. I suspect they raise price, say $1.99, and do their discounts closer to the $1.49 pricing or some form of buy X get one free, like buy 3 get 1 free.
Essentially, I'm wondering what the real world impact of the statement will be because if they push to far they lose an immense amount of business. And Coke basically employs the same plan - but the last month has seen them nix the sales and just do flat $1.69 pricing on their 2-liter bottles.
underpants
(182,834 posts)We'll see if the market withstand them passing it on.