About Those Tests I Gave You • An Open Letter to My Students
About Those Tests I Gave You An Open Letter to My Students
By Ruth Ann Dandrea
Dear 8th Graders,
Im sorry.
I didnt know.
I spent last night perusing the 150-plus pages of grading materials provided by the state in anticipation of reading and evaluating your English Language Arts Exams this morning. I knew the test was pointlessthat it has never fulfilled its stated purpose as a predictor of who would succeed and who would fail the English Regents in 11th grade. Any thinking person wouldve ditched it years ago. Instead, rather than simply give a test in 8th grade that doesnt get kids ready for the test in 11th grade, the state opted to also give a test in 7th grade to get you ready for your 8th-grade test.
But we already knew all of that.
What I learned is that the test is also criminal.
Because what I hadnt knownthis is my first time grading this examwas that it doesnt matter how well you write, or what you think. Here we spent the year reading books and emulating great writers, constructing leads that would make everyone want to read our work, developing a voice that would engage our readers, using our imaginations to make our work unique and important, and, most of all, being honest. And none of that matters. All that matters, it turns out, is that you cite two facts from the reading material in every answer. That gives you full credit. You can compose a Gettysburg Address for the 21st century on the apportioned lines in your test booklet, but if youve provided only one fact from the text you read in preparation, then you will earn only half credit. In your constructed responseno matter how well written, correct, intelligent, noble, beautiful, and meaningful it isif youve not collected any specific facts from the provided readings (even if you happen to know more information about the chosen topic than the readings provide), then you will get a zero.
And heres the really scary part, kids: The questions you were asked were written to elicit a personal response, which, if provided, earn you no credit. You were tricked; we were tricked. I wish I could believe that this paradox (you know what that literary term means because we have spent the year noting these kinds of tightropings of language) was simply the stupidity of the test-makers, that it was not some more insidious and deliberate machination. I wish I could believe that. But I dont.
....................................
the rest:
http://rethinkingschools.org/archive/26_03/26_03_dandrea.shtml