Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin

(108,072 posts)
Sat Aug 18, 2018, 03:25 PM Aug 2018

Tape's rolling; let's talk Omarosa, Brennan and more

Semi-random thoughts:

Having learned from a boss famous for doing it himself, people who work for Trump seem to feel the need to record their conversations, with him and with his people. This tells us much about the whole bunch. One imagines a dozen or so lawyers approaching a jury box, laying recorders on the rail, pushing “play” and returning to their seats while the recorders chatter away until there’s a verdict. If the jurors were AI robots, no human would have to sit through it.

It’s pretty laughable when a lying, self-promoting, untrustworthy, obnoxious, slimy former “reality” star wants to tell us what goes on in the White House. The same applies to Omarosa.

When the cheering dies down, Trump’s flummoxed flock should consider the ramifications of him (through his functionaries) firing Peter Strzok. A storied, dedicated agent, responsible for taking down more Russian spies than any preceding him, his “crime” was privately sharing thoughts about a “president” he, who should know, considers dangerous. So, was his firing because he let his opinions be known, or because he was getting in the way of Trump’s Russian pals? Asking for a country.

Should we be rejoicing in the loss of a counter-terrorism expert by pressure from above, solely because of presidential pique over his private communications? Thought experiment for Trumpists: switch a name or two, and ask yourself again.

Trump just revoked John Brennan’s security clearance, to more exultations among the implication-analyzing-incapable.

My dislike for third party candidates is increasing. What have they ever accomplished other than causing other candidates to lose? Too, (hat-tip to L.S.) I find those who insist on voting for them self-righteous and delusional. How many of their candidates, knowingly or not, are financed by people wanting to harm serious opponents to their paid-for office-seekers? Is it coincidence that in New Mexico, for example, where polls show the Democratic contender for senator handily beating the Republican, Libertarian Gary Johnson has suddenly in-ringed his hat, having previously announced he was done with politics?

Which is not to say I think our two major parties are covering themselves in glory. It’s just that, realistically, on a national scale, third parties are mainly splinter groups (Greens from Democrats, Libertarians from Republicans) who’ve achieved nothing but disruption, appealing only to the kind of purists unable to see or care about the bigger picture. I saw a car with a Jill Stein sticker the other day, and wondered, considering the saprogenic menace of Trumpism, has the owner had any second thoughts? Probably not, else it’d have been torn off by now.

https://www.heraldnet.com/opinion/schwab-tapes-rolling-lets-talk-omarosa-brennan-and-more/?utm_source=DAILY+HERALD&utm_campaign=3829f840b0-RSS_EMAIL_CAMPAIGN&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_d81d073bb4-3829f840b0-228635337

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Tape's rolling; let's talk Omarosa, Brennan and more (Original Post) Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Aug 2018 OP
Hmmmm empedocles Aug 2018 #1
Firing Strzok was more than just to discredit him as a witness. It was a gift to Putin. dameatball Aug 2018 #2
Bingo! Nitram Aug 2018 #3

empedocles

(15,751 posts)
1. Hmmmm
Sat Aug 18, 2018, 03:47 PM
Aug 2018

Omarosa gets so vilified over here. 'Suspects'/non 'purists' who 'turn' are often harshly treated; McCain, John Dean, Flake, retiring members of many stripes, Steve Schmidt, ex Republicans, etc.

They may contribute to a good cause.

Not that comfortable, with the vilification/writeoffs, etc., for fairness, human nature realities, and practical politics.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»Tape's rolling; let's tal...