Tape's rolling; let's talk Omarosa, Brennan and more
Semi-random thoughts:
Having learned from a boss famous for doing it himself, people who work for Trump seem to feel the need to record their conversations, with him and with his people. This tells us much about the whole bunch. One imagines a dozen or so lawyers approaching a jury box, laying recorders on the rail, pushing play and returning to their seats while the recorders chatter away until theres a verdict. If the jurors were AI robots, no human would have to sit through it.
Its pretty laughable when a lying, self-promoting, untrustworthy, obnoxious, slimy former reality star wants to tell us what goes on in the White House. The same applies to Omarosa.
When the cheering dies down, Trumps flummoxed flock should consider the ramifications of him (through his functionaries) firing Peter Strzok. A storied, dedicated agent, responsible for taking down more Russian spies than any preceding him, his crime was privately sharing thoughts about a president he, who should know, considers dangerous. So, was his firing because he let his opinions be known, or because he was getting in the way of Trumps Russian pals? Asking for a country.
Should we be rejoicing in the loss of a counter-terrorism expert by pressure from above, solely because of presidential pique over his private communications? Thought experiment for Trumpists: switch a name or two, and ask yourself again.
Trump just revoked John Brennans security clearance, to more exultations among the implication-analyzing-incapable.
My dislike for third party candidates is increasing. What have they ever accomplished other than causing other candidates to lose? Too, (hat-tip to L.S.) I find those who insist on voting for them self-righteous and delusional. How many of their candidates, knowingly or not, are financed by people wanting to harm serious opponents to their paid-for office-seekers? Is it coincidence that in New Mexico, for example, where polls show the Democratic contender for senator handily beating the Republican, Libertarian Gary Johnson has suddenly in-ringed his hat, having previously announced he was done with politics?
Which is not to say I think our two major parties are covering themselves in glory. Its just that, realistically, on a national scale, third parties are mainly splinter groups (Greens from Democrats, Libertarians from Republicans) whove achieved nothing but disruption, appealing only to the kind of purists unable to see or care about the bigger picture. I saw a car with a Jill Stein sticker the other day, and wondered, considering the saprogenic menace of Trumpism, has the owner had any second thoughts? Probably not, else itd have been torn off by now.
https://www.heraldnet.com/opinion/schwab-tapes-rolling-lets-talk-omarosa-brennan-and-more/?utm_source=DAILY+HERALD&utm_campaign=3829f840b0-RSS_EMAIL_CAMPAIGN&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_d81d073bb4-3829f840b0-228635337
empedocles
(15,751 posts)Omarosa gets so vilified over here. 'Suspects'/non 'purists' who 'turn' are often harshly treated; McCain, John Dean, Flake, retiring members of many stripes, Steve Schmidt, ex Republicans, etc.
They may contribute to a good cause.
Not that comfortable, with the vilification/writeoffs, etc., for fairness, human nature realities, and practical politics.