Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

xchrom

(108,903 posts)
Wed Mar 28, 2012, 09:28 AM Mar 2012

Obamacare Supreme Court Case is a Bad Joke

http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/johncassidy/2012/03/supreme-court-case-is-a-very-bad-joke.html



Forgive me if a wry tone eludes me when it comes to today’s proceedings in the Supreme Court. As far as I am concerned the whole thing is absurd—yet another example of how America’s antiquated system of government, and its determined refusal to accept the economic realities of the modern world, is undermining its future.

Early on in this morning’s session, Justice Anthony Kennedy, the swing vote on the court, said that the U. S. government had a “very heavy burden of justification” to show that an individual mandate to purchase health-care insurance was constitutional. Really? Only if Kennedy and his Republican-appointed colleagues are willing to throw out economic logic as well as seventy years of legal precedent, which, judging by their harsh questioning of Solicitor General Donald Verrilli, Jr., they may well be.

The economics isn’t very complicated. The health-care industry, which makes up about a sixth of the economy, is rife with inefficiency, waste, and coverage gaps. In seeking to remedy some of these problems, the Obama Administration made a deal with the private-insurance industry—the same deal Mitt Romney made when he was governor of Massachusetts. On the one hand, the federal government barred the insurers from discriminating against the sick and the elderly, thereby raising the industry’s costs. On the other hand, the feds obliged uninsured individuals to purchase coverage, thereby expanding the insurers’ revenues. We can argue whether this was the best way to proceed. (At the time the bill was passed, I raised some doubts about how much it would cost.) But it was a straightforward instance of the central government seeking to redress the failures of the private market—something akin to imposing fuel standards on auto manufacturers, providing state pensions, and forcing banks to hold adequate capital reserves.

Read more http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/johncassidy/2012/03/supreme-court-case-is-a-very-bad-joke.html#ixzz1qPyByugY
5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Obamacare Supreme Court Case is a Bad Joke (Original Post) xchrom Mar 2012 OP
To me CAPHAVOC Mar 2012 #1
Really? List them. bowens43 Mar 2012 #3
OK I just tuned in for the last. But how could Dateline hold them hostage? CAPHAVOC Mar 2012 #4
If the republicans have their way Turbineguy Mar 2012 #2
I have no doubt they will declare it un-constitutional. Kablooie Mar 2012 #5
 

CAPHAVOC

(1,138 posts)
1. To me
Wed Mar 28, 2012, 09:35 AM
Mar 2012

There are more reasons to reject this law for a Liberal than a Conservative. The few crumbs given out are hardly worth it.

 

CAPHAVOC

(1,138 posts)
4. OK I just tuned in for the last. But how could Dateline hold them hostage?
Wed Mar 28, 2012, 10:37 AM
Mar 2012

#1. Aetna
#2. United Health Care
#3. BCBS
#4. AARP
#5. Phizer and Friends

Turbineguy

(37,372 posts)
2. If the republicans have their way
Wed Mar 28, 2012, 09:48 AM
Mar 2012

there will be tremendous opportunities for young people who go into the funeral services industry. Think of it as a jobs program.

Kablooie

(18,641 posts)
5. I have no doubt they will declare it un-constitutional.
Wed Mar 28, 2012, 12:12 PM
Mar 2012

And the whole plan will unravel.

It hasn't been long enough for most of the plan's provisions to kick in so people won't see a lot of change in their current situation. If the full plan had been implemented everyone would see what a difference it would make to go back and it would be harder to change.

This is exactly what the Republicans don't want so they are pre-judging the plan before it has a chance to prove itself.

SCOTUS isn't supposed to do this. They are supposed to judge based on current situations, not future ones. You can't bring a case to them about a future problem but they made a political decision to break precedent and judicial law in this case in order to kill the plan.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»Obamacare Supreme Court C...