Obamacare Supreme Court Case is a Bad Joke
http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/johncassidy/2012/03/supreme-court-case-is-a-very-bad-joke.htmlForgive me if a wry tone eludes me when it comes to todays proceedings in the Supreme Court. As far as I am concerned the whole thing is absurdyet another example of how Americas antiquated system of government, and its determined refusal to accept the economic realities of the modern world, is undermining its future.
Early on in this mornings session, Justice Anthony Kennedy, the swing vote on the court, said that the U. S. government had a very heavy burden of justification to show that an individual mandate to purchase health-care insurance was constitutional. Really? Only if Kennedy and his Republican-appointed colleagues are willing to throw out economic logic as well as seventy years of legal precedent, which, judging by their harsh questioning of Solicitor General Donald Verrilli, Jr., they may well be.
The economics isnt very complicated. The health-care industry, which makes up about a sixth of the economy, is rife with inefficiency, waste, and coverage gaps. In seeking to remedy some of these problems, the Obama Administration made a deal with the private-insurance industrythe same deal Mitt Romney made when he was governor of Massachusetts. On the one hand, the federal government barred the insurers from discriminating against the sick and the elderly, thereby raising the industrys costs. On the other hand, the feds obliged uninsured individuals to purchase coverage, thereby expanding the insurers revenues. We can argue whether this was the best way to proceed. (At the time the bill was passed, I raised some doubts about how much it would cost.) But it was a straightforward instance of the central government seeking to redress the failures of the private marketsomething akin to imposing fuel standards on auto manufacturers, providing state pensions, and forcing banks to hold adequate capital reserves.
Read more http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/johncassidy/2012/03/supreme-court-case-is-a-very-bad-joke.html#ixzz1qPyByugY
There are more reasons to reject this law for a Liberal than a Conservative. The few crumbs given out are hardly worth it.
bowens43
(16,064 posts)CAPHAVOC
(1,138 posts)#1. Aetna
#2. United Health Care
#3. BCBS
#4. AARP
#5. Phizer and Friends
Turbineguy
(37,372 posts)there will be tremendous opportunities for young people who go into the funeral services industry. Think of it as a jobs program.
Kablooie
(18,641 posts)And the whole plan will unravel.
It hasn't been long enough for most of the plan's provisions to kick in so people won't see a lot of change in their current situation. If the full plan had been implemented everyone would see what a difference it would make to go back and it would be harder to change.
This is exactly what the Republicans don't want so they are pre-judging the plan before it has a chance to prove itself.
SCOTUS isn't supposed to do this. They are supposed to judge based on current situations, not future ones. You can't bring a case to them about a future problem but they made a political decision to break precedent and judicial law in this case in order to kill the plan.